Kickstarting manufacturing has been a long-standing goal of India’s economic policy. The recent surge in protectionism in economies, especially the sanctions imposed by the Trump administration have given the challenge a new dimension. This 3-part series will explain India’s manufacturing challenge from a holistic perspective by situating Indian manufacturing in international, sub-national, and sector-wise (formal and informal) contexts.
The first part will explain the importance of manufacturing in India’s economic standing internationally and its long-term growth. The second part will
Manufacturing’s contribution to India’s economic growth has remained steady over timeManufacturing’s contribution to India’s economic growth has remained steady over time
The Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) database has industry-wise Gross Value Added (GVA) data from 1965-66 onwards. If one were to divide it into three broad periods: pre-reform (1965-66 to 1990-91), post-reform till the Global Financial Crisis (1990-91 to 2008-09) and post Global Financial Crisis (2008-09 to 2024-25), a striking pattern emerges as far as manufacturing’s contribution to economic growth is concerned. It has remained broadly stable – the 1990-91 to 2008-09 period is the best by a small distance – in the three periods, unlike agriculture, which has seen a large fall, and services, which has seen a sharp increase. Manufacturing’s GVA share has remained steady between the 15%-20% mark since the 1980s in India.
How does India compare in terms of manufacturing economy globally?
The most commonly heard statistic about India’s international economic standing is that it will become the third-largest economy in the next three years or so. However, what is more important for living standards in a country is not its overall GDP level but its per capita GDP. On this count, India is ranked pretty low if one were to take the world’s top 50 economies by GDP size in current dollars. The question to ask about the importance of manufacturing is this: how important is manufacturing in boosting a country’s per capita GDP? The chart below shows that there are many countries which have a higher per capita GDP than India but a lower share of manufacturing in their value added. However, the example India should be looking at carefully is China, the only country which is comparable to India’s population size. China’s per capita GDP (in purchasing power dollars) and manufacturing share in GVA are both almost double that of India.
Why increasing manufacturing’s share is important for India
While per capita GDP is a useful metric to compare countries internationally, it can be a misleading indicator about the well-being of the population at large within a country. This is because the income generated as captured in GDP data can be distributed in an unequal manner across sectors. A comparison of output and employment share of key sectors in the Indian economy shows this clearly. Sectors such as agriculture employ a disproportionately large share of people than their share in output, while sectors such as financial services employ very few people and produce a much larger share in output. Manufacturing is one of the more equal sectors in terms of share in value added and employment in India, which suggests that any increase in its output share will also lead to some sort of trickle-down benefits to people who work there. If such people are drawn from the ranks of those working in agriculture, it can help significantly in solving India’s inequality problem. This data underscores manufacturing’s critical role in boosting China’s per capita GDP.
While the data given above underlines the importance of manufacturing in boosting India’s economic (especially living standards) prospects, it needs more context to give an insight into the exact nature of challenges which need to be taken into account to give a boost to manufacturing in India. The second and third parts of this data journalism series will do exactly that.
{{^htLoading}}{{/htLoading}}{{#usCountry}}{{/usCountry}} 