Today in New Delhi, India
Nov 13, 2018-Tuesday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

1988 road rage case: Supreme Court to pronounce verdict on Navjot Singh Sidhu’s appeal tomorrow

Sidhu had claimed that evidence about the cause of death of victim Gurnam Singh in the 1988 road rage case, in which he is accused, was contradictory and medical opinion in this regard was “vague”.

india Updated: May 14, 2018 20:52 IST
Press Trust of India, New Delhi
road rage,Navjot Singh Sidhu,Supreme Court
Cricketer-turned-politician Navjot Singh Sidhu was awarded a three-year jail term by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in a 1988 road rage case.(PTI/File Photo)

The Supreme Court is likely to pronounce on Tuesday its judgement on the appeal filed by cricketer-turned-politician Navjot Singh Sidhu, who was awarded a three-year jail term by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in a 1988 road rage case.

A bench of Justices J Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul had on April 18 reserved its judgement in the case in which Sidhu, who had quit the BJP and joined the Congress days before the Punjab assembly election last year, had claimed that evidence about the cause of death of victim Gurnam Singh was contradictory and the medical opinion in this regard was “vague”.

Besides Sidhu, currently the tourism minister of Punjab, an appeal was also filed by Rupinder Singh Sandhu, who was also convicted and sentenced to a three-year jail by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case.

According to the prosecution, Sidhu and Sandhu were allegedly in a Gypsy parked on the middle of a road near the Sheranwala Gate Crossing in Patiala on December 27, 1988, when the victim and two others were on their way to the bank to withdraw money.

It was alleged that when they had reached the crossing, Gurnam Singh, driving a Maruti car, found the Gypsy in the middle of the road and asked the occupants, Sidhu and Sandhu, to remove it. This led to heated exchanges.

The police had claimed that Singh was beaten up by Sidhu who later fled the crime scene. The victim was taken to a hospital where he was declared dead.

During arguments in the apex court, senior advocate RS Cheema, representing Sidhu, had questioned the evidence brought on record regarding the cause of death of the victim and had also referred to the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) dealing with culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Ironically, on April 12, the Amarinder Singh-led Congress government had favoured in the top court the high court’s judgement convicting and awarding of the three-year jail term to Sidhu.

Earlier, the counsel for the state had told the apex court that “the trial court verdict was rightly set aside by the high court and Sidhu had given fist blow to deceased Gurnam Singh leading to his death through brain haemorrhage”.

The state had argued that the trial court was wrong in its finding that the man had died of cardiac arrest and not brain haemorrhage. The counsel for the complainant had argued that Sidhu’s sentence should be enhanced as it was a case of murder and the cricketer-turned-politician had deliberately removed the keys of deceased’s car so that he did not get medical assistance.

Sidhu was acquitted of the murder charges by the trial court in September 1999.

However, the high court had reversed the verdict and held Sidhu and Sandhu guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder in December, 2006. It had sentenced them to three-year jail and imposed a fine of Rs one lakh each on the convicts.

In 2007, the apex court had stayed the conviction of Sidhu and Sandhu in the case, paving the way for him to contest the by-poll for Amritsar Lok Sabha seat.

First Published: May 14, 2018 20:52 IST