Can a law to raise marriage age for women work?

Updated on Dec 24, 2021 02:33 AM IST

New Delhi: There is no rational reason why the minimum age of marriage for women should be lower than men

Uttar Pradesh government officials have been asked to submit affidavits declaring that no dowry was taken during their marriage. (Representational image)
Uttar Pradesh government officials have been asked to submit affidavits declaring that no dowry was taken during their marriage. (Representational image)
ByAbhishek Jha, Hindustan Times, New Delhi

There is no rational reason why the minimum age of marriage for women should be lower than men. However, that is exactly the case under the current law that makes child marriages illegal in India: the Prevention of Child Marriage Act, 2006 (PCMA). 

A bill to amend this law and make the minimum age for both genders 21 years – it is 18 years for women and 21 years for men currently – was introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 21. 

As with every bill, this one also comes with a “Statement of Objects and Reasons” for enacting it. This statement cites the equality of genders guaranteed by the Constitution of India as one of the reasons for enacting the bill. 

However, an HT analysis shows that the amendment is unlikely to achieve its other objectives and its reasons are divorced from what the government’s own data says. Here are four charts that explain this.

Decline in child marriages sped up slightly after the 2006 law

The first reason cited in the bill for amending the PCMA is that the 2006 law has not completely ended child marriages. 

“The Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929, was replaced by the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, to prohibit solemnisation of child marriages, but this highly pernicious practice is still not completely eradicated from our society. Hence, there is an urgent need to tackle this societal issue and to bring in reforms,” the statement citing the reasons for the amendment says. 

The National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) support this. A decade after the 2006 law was passed, over a third of women of age 20-49 years reported being married before turning 18. This proves that the practice exists, and that reforms are needed. What the statement does not explain is how increasing the minimum age will end it. 

The changes made in 2006, for example, were related to how child marriages are to be prevented and not the minimum age, and seem to have sped up the decline in child marriages. 

The share of 20-49 years old women married before adulthood declined at the rate of 1.03 percentage points per year from 1998-99 to 2005-06. It decreased at the rate of 1.7 percentage points per year after that.

Differences in personal laws don’t impact child marriages

The amendment bill and the reasons cited for it also seem to suggest that religious personal laws are somehow related to or are enablers of child marriages. 

“Invoking different marriage laws of different faiths, I rise to introduce the amendment bill,” Smriti Iriani, the Union minister for women and child development, said in the Lok Sabha. 

Most personal laws have the same age bar as the PCMA. The difference with PCMA is only in the Muslim personal law, where the age of puberty – considered to be 15 years – is the minimum age. 

NFHS data shows that these personal laws have little correlation with the prevalence of child marriages in different communities. 

Child marriages are 1.6 times more likely among Hindus than among Christians although their personal laws have the same minimum age criteria. 

Muslims and Hindus are almost equally likely to participate in a child marriage even with different age criteria.

Nutritional status and employment can be affected by marriage at any age

Two other reasons cited for bringing the amendment are that it will help in improving nutritional status and employment prospects of women. HT analysed the impact of child marriage on these indicators in a story published on August 23, 2020

Young or breastfeeding women indeed have worse nutritional status than older or women who are not breastfeeding. However, nutritional status is also correlated with wealth of the household. 36% women in the bottom 20% of households by wealth were underweight, according to the 2015-16 NFHS, compared to 12% women in the top 20%. 

Similarly, the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) conducted in 2018-19 shows that up to 20 years of age, labour force participation of married women is similar if not higher than unmarried women. 

In the 21-25 age group and the 26-30 age group, unmarried women are twice as likely to participate in the labour force as married women. This suggests that increasing the age of marriage will not change women’s employment prospects until marital norms are decoupled from work participation. 

Since it does not explain how job prospects will change, in effect, the law may make the poorest people most vulnerable to its prosecution provisions since child marriages are most prevalent in the lowest wealth category, according to NFHS data.

The law needs more improvement in other areas

NFHS data shown above suggests that child marriages are still widely prevalent. Cases filed under PCMA are relatively much less. 25% women in the 20-24 age group reported being married before turning 18 in the 2015-16 NFHS. 

This would, in effect, amount to at least 14 million women married before legal age after the 2006 law was passed, according to March 2016 population projections for the age group. 

National Crime Records Bureau data, however, shows only 1,666 cases filed under PCMA from 2007 to 2016. Why is this the case? One reason is that the Child Marriage Prohibition Officer provided under the PCMA is a government servant at the district level carrying additional charge, who is neither proximate to the site of such marriages, nor has the time and training to perform the role, said Madhu Mehra, head of research and training at Partners for Law and Development (PLD). 

Child marriages are often stopped by social activists, who are few and far between, and they prefer to mediate as shaming the family results in backlash, making matters worse for the child, she added.

Even when child marriage cases are brought to courts, they may not be against child marriage per se. PLD analysed 83 cases of child marriage – not all filed under PCMA but all concerning annulling one – that were decided between 2008 and 2017. 54 of them were ones of elopement, where either the parents were prosecuting the husband or seeking custody of their daughter or also cases where the couple sought protection from their parents. 25 other cases were of an arranged child marriage. They were related to the marriage breaking down because of domestic abuse or the partners being incompatible.

The reforms the amendment bill talks about could well begin by hiring trained officers, increasing fund allocation for nutrition, increasing the right to education up to the minimum age of marriage, or simply put, spending some money on the objectives the bill seeks to achieve.

Get Latest India Newsalong with Latest Newsand Top Headlinesfrom India and around the world.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
  • ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Abhishek Jha is a data journalist. He analyses public data for finding news, with a focus on the environment, Indian politics and economy, and Covid-19.

SHARE
Story Saved
×
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
My Offers
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Monday, November 28, 2022
Start 15 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Register Free and get Exciting Deals