Sign in

Hindu groups criticise plea for review of Ayodhya order

Hindu groups also term the decision a tactic to stall the construction of a Ram temple.

Updated on: Dec 3, 2019, 04:27:52 IST
Hindustan Times, Lucknow | By
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Prominent Hindu groups flayed the Jamiat-Ulema-i-Hind’s (JUH) decision to ask the Supreme Court on Monday to review its judgment in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit even as the Muslim body defended its petition.

Members of Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam organization hold placards and shout slogans as they protest against the Supreme Court verdict of Ayodhya, in Chennai. (ANI Photo)
Members of Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam organization hold placards and shout slogans as they protest against the Supreme Court verdict of Ayodhya, in Chennai. (ANI Photo)

The Hindu groups dubbed the decision a tactic to stall the construction of a Ram temple.

“The review petition will have no impact on the Ayodhya verdict,” said Mahant Nritya Gopal Das, head of the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas that spearheads the Ram temple movement. “This petition will create disharmony between Hindu and Muslims,” he added.

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), an affiliate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), also attacked the JUH.

“This review petition is yet another attempt by Muslim organisations to obstruct construction of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya ,” said Sharad Sharma, regional spokesperson, VHP.

The JUH said the review petition was not filed to disturb communal harmony.

“We filed a review as the verdict is beyond understanding. Justice has not been done,” said JUH chief Maulana Arshad Madani .

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has already announced its intention of filing a review petition but a number of other litigants, including the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board, have said they respect the top court’s judgment.

Waqf Board chief Zafar Farooqui said the body had already cleared its stand on the issue and referred to a meeting last month that decided against filing a review petition.

“I have always maintained that I will accept the courts’ decision whether it is in favour of mandir or mosque. I am personally against any decision to go for review of the court’s verdict,” said Iqbal Ansari, a Muslim litigant.

  • Pawan Dixit
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Pawan Dixit

    Pawan Dixit, Assistant Editor, brings over 20 years of frontline reporting experience to the newsroom. A specialist on Uttar Pradesh politics and governance, he has reported from the ground across the state’s most consequential stories. He cut his teeth in eastern UP, spending 15 years covering the region. Based in Varanasi, he reported the 2012 UP Assembly polls and the 2014 Lok Sabha elections that reshaped the state’s political map. Moving to Lucknow in 2016, he has since led coverage of the 2017 and 2022 UP Assembly elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. His reporting tracks the BJP’s strategy, opposition moves, and voter sentiment across all 75 districts. Pawan has been a constant presence in Ayodhya since 2016. He reported the entire arc of the Ram Mandir movement — from the legal fight to the Supreme Court verdict, through temple construction, to the inauguration. He continues to track every development at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. On the state beat, he covers the BJP, the Industrial Development Department, and handles key outstation political assignments. He also reports major cases from the district court, Lucknow bench of the High Court, and the State Information Commission. Along with this, he also reports on NGT's important decisions related to UP. Known for sharp sourcing and clear analysis, Pawan connects politics, policy, infrastructure and faith — the forces driving UP today. He has reported developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir movement since 2016. The Supreme Court's Ram Mandir verdict, temple construction and the its opening have been reported by him. He reports all developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir Trust. He covers state BJP, Industrial development department, outstation political assignments, reports special cases from district court, high court and state information commissionRead More