Sign in

Land-for-jobs scam: Lalu, kin ‘consolidated’ their land, says ED charge sheet

The charge sheet filed by ED states that seven land parcels in Patna were transferred to Lalu's wife and daughter by the family members of the job candidates.

Updated on: Jan 31, 2024, 06:00:12 IST
By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad and his family members acquired at a discount, separate land parcels from candidates who were given jobs in the railways, with a purpose to “consolidate” the land already owned by the family to increase the size of their overall landholding and, therefore, its value in the real estate market, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has claimed in its charge sheet filed earlier this month in the land-for-jobs money laundering probe.

RJD chief Lalu Prasad. (ANI)
RJD chief Lalu Prasad. (ANI)

Overall, seven land parcels in Patna were transferred at throwaway prices in the name of Lalu’s wife Rabri Devi and daughter Hema Yadav by the family members of the candidates or the candidates themselves who applied for and received jobs as Group D substitutes in railways, when Lalu headed the ministry of railways between 2004 and 2009.

Interestingly, some of those who transferred their land to the Lalu family in return for the jobs did so to people who worked for Rabri Devi as security guard and Gaushala (dairy) worker, and, they, in turn, transferred land to the family, the charge sheet explained.

A Delhi court last week took cognisance of the charge sheet, which names Rabri Devi, daughters Misa Bharti and Hema Yadav, along with others as accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The federal investigation agency seems to have stepped up the pace of its investigations in recent weeks. On Monday, it questioned Lalu in Patna and on Tuesday, it was the turn of his son Tejashwi Yadav.

READ | Land-for-jobs scam: ED questions Lalu for 10 hours; RJD stages stir

Neither Lalu nor Tejashwi has been named as an accused in this charge sheet. To be sure, agencies often file supplementary charge sheets as the investigation progresses.

“Illegal gratifications obtained by Lalu Prasad, the then railway minister, through his family members and associate in the form of land parcels in lieu of railway jobs are proceeds of crime (POC) derived out of criminal activity. The land parcels (which are POC) were acquired by the Yadav family members to consolidate the land holdings already in their possession. The POC were acquired in the name of Rabri Devi, Misa Bharti, Hema Yadav and company AK Infosystems Pvt Ltd ( in which the family holds ownership),” the ED charge sheet, seen by HT, said.

The land parcels received from the candidates were adjacent to a parcel of land bought by Rabri Devi in 1991, the charge sheet said. “It is not a simple case of accepting illegal gratification in the form of separate land parcels but a larger design to consolidate land holdings already in the name of accused persons to boost profits in the real estate market,” it added.

The candidates or their family members, in return for the jobs, transferred two land parcels to Rabri Devi. “Another two land parcels were purchased by two other individuals, Hridyanand Chaudhary and Lalan Chaudhary (who worked in Rabri Devi’s Gaushala), and subsequently both of them transferred their land parcels to Hema Yadav through gift deeds. All four land parcels were situated adjacent to the land bought by Rabri (Devi) in 1991. This was done to increase the size of landholding and increase the price and attractiveness/desirability of the now consolidated land parcels in the real estate market,” the charge sheet added.

Referring to AK Infosystems, registered at D-1088, New Friends Colony, Delhi, which is also used by Tejashwi Yadav as his residence in the Capital, the ED charge sheet said, it “acted as a tool for Lalu Prasad Yadav to hold on to ill-gotten wealth without being detected by authorities”.

READ | Land-for-jobs scam: ED interrogates Tejashwi; RJD attacks Centre

By acquiring AK Infosystems in 2014, in which Rabri Devi and Tejashwi Yadav hold 85% and 15%, respectively, the family also acquired the assets of the company, ED said.

The federal agency further claimed that after the Income Tax department initiated proceedings against the Yadavs in 2017, targeting their proxy holdings, the family’s chartered accountant Suman Kumar Nayak met Rabri Devi in Patna and “advised the family to regularise the affairs of all the companies”.

“The motive was to avoid detection by authorities and to project things in a way which add tinge of legality to the past transactions/asset acquisition of the companies and to cover the loopholes left during handing over the company with intention to avoid the inquiries from various agencies,” the charge sheet said.

The companies named in the charge sheet, AK Infosystems and A B Exports Pvt Ltd, have been termed shell companies by ED, which claimed that they received proceeds of crime.

ED’s case is that the appointment of substitutes in Group-D jobs in Indian Railways in 2004-09 was in violation of existing procedure and that the candidates, directly or through their immediate family members, sold land to the family members of Lalu Prasad at discounted rates of up to one-fourth to one-fifth of prevailing market rates.

  • Neeraj Chauhan
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Neeraj Chauhan

    Neeraj Chauhan is a senior journalist with Hindustan Times and an investigative reporter specialising in national security, terrorism, organised crime, narcotics, corruption, financial crime and complex investigations. With over 21 years of experience across Hindustan Times, The Times of India, The Indian Express and The Pioneer, he has built deep expertise in India’s internal security and law-enforcement landscape. Neeraj has extensively covered India’s principal investigative, intelligence and security agencies, including the NIA, CBI, ED, IB, R&AW, MHA and other central security forces. His work has included deeply reported investigations into terrorism, terror financing, cross-border crime, narcotics trafficking, cybercrime, financial fraud and political and corporate corruption. He has reported on some of the most significant terror attacks and security developments in India over the past two decades, including the Delhi serial blasts, the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, the 2019 Pulwama terror attack and the recent Pahalgam attack. His reporting has also chronicled the rise and decline of the Indian Mujahideen, the activities and subsequent crackdown on the Popular Front of India (PFI), Islamist extremist networks, the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir, insurgencies in the Northeast and Maoist violence. Some of Neeraj’s major breaking stories are in Aryan Khan drug case, Sushant Singh Rajput suicide, interception of a 3,000-kg Afghan heroin consignment worth about ₹21,000 crore at Mundra port, Sri Lanka easter bombings, Aarushi-Hemraj murders in Noida, 2G scam, coal block allocation scam, AgustWestland VVIP chopper deal and major bank frauds and extradition cases involving Mehul Choksi, Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya. His reporting is marked by an ability to cultivate sources, analyse confidential and complex documents, and follow investigations over several years—from the initial breakthrough to chargesheets, trials and international legal proceedings. He specialises in making complicated security and investigative developments accessible while examining their wider implications for governance and public policy. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow at the University of Westminster, Neeraj also spent time at the Financial Times as part of the fellowship. He was also a Robert Bosch Media Ambassadors India-Germany Fellow, studying at the University of Tübingen and working with Der Tagesspiegel in Berlin. He has previously taught investigative journalism and crime reporting as a guest faculty member at the Times School of Journalism. Over more than two decades, Neeraj has established himself as an authoritative voice on India’s national security and investigative landscape, with his reporting closely followed by officials, investigators, lawyers, policymakers and readers seeking insight into some of the country’s most complex and consequential developments.Read More