Sign in

SC rejects petition on alleged judges bribery scam, calls it ‘contemptuous’

Apex court says no judges have been named in the CBI investigation against UP organisation that allegedly paid bribes to secure favourable court orders

Updated on: Nov 15, 2017, 09:40:47 IST
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

A Supreme Court bench rejected on Tuesday a petition seeking a court-monitored investigation into an alleged bribery racket that is said to have attempted to sway members of the judiciary.

Lawyers outside the Supreme Court in Delhi. (Mint file photo)
Lawyers outside the Supreme Court in Delhi. (Mint file photo)

The petition was seen to have divided members of the top court last week, when a constitutional bench passed a ruling saying only the chief justice was authorised to assign cases — overturning a fellow judge’s order that would have sent the petition to a 5-judge bench.

“We hope all will work and unite for the welfare of this institution. Even we are not above the law but everything needs to be as per the law,” the judges said, rejecting the plea filed by lawyer Kamini Jaiswal.

Justice Arun Misra, the judge who authored the verdict, said no judge was mentioned in the FIR filed by CBI against the UP organisation — Prasad Educational Trust. “Case didn’t mention any judge nor it could as per law. No matter was pending in SC when FIR was registered.”

The 3-judge bench said the petition was contemptuous in nature, but it stopped short of initiating contempt proceedings.

The court also said the senior advocate who mentioned the petition before the other judge, justice J Chelameswar, indulged in “forum shopping” and did not inform the court about the second case.

Forum shopping refers to the practice of litigants approaching courts that are thought most likely to give a favourable verdict.

The petition was mentioned in front of Chelameswar a day after it was presented before another set of judges. Chelameswar referred the matter to a Constitution bench, but this order was struck down later.

According to the investigation being carried out by the CBI, Lucknow-based Prasad Education Trust allegedly paid money to middlemen who promised to secure a favourable ruling regarding its medical college licences. The trust’s colleges had been banned from admitting students by the Union health ministry, a ban against which it went to court.

Retired Orissa high court judge Ishrat Masroor Quddusi is one of the key accused.

  • Bhadra Sinha
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Bhadra Sinha

    Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.Read More

Follow India news real-time updates and the latest news covered on Hindustan Times, featuring today's critical updates on Sonam Wangchuk LIVE and more across India.