Sign in

Supreme Court stays order banning MediaOne

The Malayalam news channel employs nearly 350 people and monthly salary bills to the tune of 83 lakh were required to be paid, its lawyers said.

Updated on: Mar 16, 2022, 01:59:43 IST
By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The ban on Malayalam news channel MediaOne on alleged national security concerns was temporarily lifted by the Supreme Court on Tuesday, almost six weeks after the channel’s licence was revoked by the central government.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted the Centre’s ban on Malayalam news channel MediaOne. (AFP)
The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted the Centre’s ban on Malayalam news channel MediaOne. (AFP)

A bench of justices Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Surya Kant and Vikram Nath examined confidential material prepared by government to support its decision revoking security clearance to the channel that led to a blanket withdrawal of its uplinking and downlinking licences, before providing interim relief to petitioner, Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd, the channel’s owner.

“At the present stage, the prayer for interim relief has been made out by the petitioner,” the judges said in the order. “Having due regard to the contents of the files produced by the respondent (central government), the order of the Union government revoking security clearance granted to petitioner shall remain stayed pending further orders.”

The court, on March 10 directed the government to produce all the relevant files. Additional solicitor general KM Nataraj appeared with the home ministry files containing intelligence inputs against the channel in a sealed cover.

The Kerala high court on March 2 dismissed the channel’s petition challenging the ban by relying on these confidential files.

Madhyamam Broadcasting, represented by advocates Dushyant Dave and Huzefa Ahmadi, objected to the presenting of materials in a sealed cover, arguing that this earlier resulted in an order being passed without it being able to examine the rationale behind the ban.

“If this is allowed, no channel or media house in this country can be safe,” Dave told the top court on Tuesday.

The security clearance was granted once to the channel, and for renewal of its uplinking licence, which fell due in November 2021, further security clearance was not needed, the lawyer said.

Also Read | ‘Clampdown on press freedom’: MPs and activists criticise ban on Mediaone channel

“For six weeks we are shut down simply because the channel is run by members of the minority community. If my channel runs, heavens will not fall. It cannot be so serious a national security threat that I can make the government fall,” Dave argued.

The channel employs nearly 350 people and monthly salary bills to the tune of 83 lakh were required to be paid, its lawyers said.

“The issue as to whether content of files should be disclosed to the petitioner to enable them pursue their challenge is kept open and will be decided before the petition is taken up for final disposal,” the bench said, posting further hearing on the matter next month.

During the hearing, Justice Chandrachud said: “I am averse to sealed cover jurisprudence” and told the Centre: “You have to disclose something to them.”

Even as the court examined the files in the sealed cover, it clarified: “The perusal of files by the court to the exclusion of the petitioner is not an expression of this court on the tenability of contention of the petitioner that they will be entitled to inspect the files, which will be open to them at the time of final disposal.”

Additional solicitor general SV Raju, also appearing for the Centre, objected to the court’s order allowing the channel to resume operations. The licence of the channel expired in September and is due for renewal, he said.

The stay on revocation of security clearance does not automatically result in renewal of the channel’s licence, which has to be separately applied for, Raju argued.

“You allowed them to continue in operation since November till January. Renewal was not denied on the ground that licence had expired but that security clearance got revoked,” the bench responded.

Nataraj informed the court that granting clearance to the petitioner is “dangerous” as it had began a campaign on social media against the order of the single judge bench of the Kerala high court that dismissed its petition last month.

Dave said he categorically disowned and condemned any such action but denied that the channel was involved in it.

Media One, which is a news and current affairs channel, secured security clearance from the home ministry in February 2011, following which it obtained a license to operate the channel in September 2011. This permission had to be renewed after 10 years.

On January 5 this year, the channel was served with a show-cause notice revoking the permission on the grounds of national security and public order.

In February 2020, the channel’s licence was briefly suspended by the home ministry following its coverage of the Delhi riots.

Check India news real-time updates, latest news on Hindustan Times and more across India.