Chinese-made for $12.99 or US-built for $24.97?

Updated on May 23, 2007 02:09 PM IST
For Kurt Runge and millions of other Americans, it's not easy to shop for everyday goods without adding to the ballooning US trade gap with China.
HT Image
HT Image
Reuters | ByDavid Lawder, Washington

For Kurt Runge and millions of other Americans, it's not easy to shop for everyday goods without adding to the ballooning US trade gap with China.

Examining a $12.99 Chinese-made garden spade at a local Home Depot store on Saturday, Runge said price is often the determining factor in his purchase decisions.

"I try to buy American but I have a tight budget and sometimes I just buy the cheapest thing available," said the 25-year-old graduate student.

A similar spade, assembled in the United States from domestic and imported components, cost nearly twice as much, at $24.97. It stayed on the store's display rack.

In the power tools section, even iconic US brands such as DeWalt and Ridgid offer Chinese-made models or components.

As high-level US and Chinese officials launched thorny discussions over stubborn trade imbalances on Tuesday, one thing was clear: the rising tide of cheap Chinese goods in America is pervasive and it costs US manufacturing jobs but it saves consumers money.

"China in many ways is helping to insulate this country from inflation," said Peter Schiff, president of Euro Pacific Capital Inc., a brokerage in Darien, Connecticut.

"We've effectively exported our inflation by taking the money that the Fed creates and exchanging it for low-priced consumer goods. The Chinese then recycle that money back into US assets which keeps our interest rates artificially low."

That cycle helped swell the US trade deficit with China to a record $233 billion in 2006. In the first three months of this year, the United States has logged a shortfall of $57 billion, more than 20 percent above the year-ago level.

Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Richard Fisher said last year that globalization, namely competition from China and India, had "rewired the lights and switches on policy-makers' control panels."

"My guess is that the relationship between these lights and switches and the real world of production, prices and jobs is not what it was two decades ago or a decade ago or even two years ago," he said.

A recent Deutsche Bank analysis estimates that Asian production has shaved a couple tenths of a percentage point off core US inflation. In March, consumer prices for items other than food and energy, as measured by the Fed's favoured inflation gauge, stood 2.1 per cent above the year-ago level.


US lawmakers argue an artificially low value for China's yuan currency which some economists believe is undervalued by as much as 40 per cent puts American manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage and costs jobs.

If there is no concrete action to address the imbalances, some members of Congress are poised to push legislation to make it easier for the US Commerce Department to impose tariffs aimed at offsetting Chinese subsidies or to define currency manipulation as a subsidy under US trade law.

In the US Midwest manufacturing heartland, where job losses attributed to Chinese imports have hit hard, many businesses "feel like they're up against a tough and unfairly strong competitor," said Richard DeKaser, chief economist at National City Corp. in Cleveland.

And it's not just a cheap yuan that has businesses bothered. Chinese firms face lower labour costs and less-stringent regulation, as well, DeKaser said.

Many US companies are adapting by shifting some production to China, renegotiating labour contracts or merging with stronger companies, all of which serves to reduce costs.

Ironically, it is often low- to moderate-income US workers who benefit most from low-priced Chinese consumer goods purchased at discount stores such as Wal-Mart or Home Depot. "They're also the same folks who have borne the brunt of the labour market dislocations," DeKaser said.

China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said on Tuesday that China never set out to accumulate a trade surplus and noted that Chinese goods were a boon for US consumers.

But the China Daily newspaper, a Communist Party mouthpiece, blamed overspending Americans.

"The US must understand that the real cause of its trade deficit is that Americans spend too much and save too little. No external measure can fix that domestic issue easily and painlessly," the paper said in an editorial.

Close Story
Story Saved
Saved Articles
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Wednesday, August 10, 2022
Start 15 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now