It insults rather than inspires
The Paralympics suggests that those who can't overcome disability are shirkers. Robert Jones writes.Updated: Sep 03, 2012 21:55 IST
I am not a sports fan. Loathed it at school, steadfastly bored by it since. So I was not a keen observer of the Olympics and won't be following the Paralympics either. This might seem strange. The Paralympics, after all, promise the opportunity to show that disabled people are not work-avoiding stay-at-homes glued to daytime TV. And as I'm disabled, I should welcome them - greet with open arms this opportunity to show the world what so-called disabled people can do.
I won't. Not because I don't give a damn for sport generally, or the Paralympics specifically. While I don't understand why people should want to run, row or swim faster than others, I've never known why people would want to be accountants, either. It's the baggage associated with the Paralympics that's my problem - the subliminal and explicit messages.
After all, look at ... name your Paralympian, or Stephen Hawking, or one-handed concert pianist Nicholas McCarthy.
Such people are definitions of exception. Whereas no one expects your average politician to run like a Bolt or a Farah, it's commonplace to hear "if he can do it so can you" as a rebuke or encouragement to disabled people. This really misunderstands the nature of disability itself. Particularly when it involves state benefits, and particularly when irresponsible ministers and journalists can't or won't distinguish between fit young athletes - even with bits missing - and the generality of disabled people.
I became disabled slowly, progressively, after I broke my back in a car accident. I was never good at sport even before then - probably why I hated it. I was the last to be picked for the football team - didn't see well, had fits, flat feet, got depressed. But I managed - until the crash. Complicated by a family history of osteoarthritis, over decades I became less able. Life became punctuated by increasing pain and stronger drugs to limit it. At no point did I opt for disability as a lifestyle choice - it chose me.
I have as much in common with the Paralympian Oscar Pistorius as you, gentle reader, have with Bolt - which for most of you isn't much at all. If people accepted that, there wouldn't be a problem, and I would feel less chippy about the Paralympics - but they don't.
I don't believe in role models in general. I never could fathom why judges should admonish footballers who get caught doing something drunkenly with no trousers on that they've let everyone down, since young people look up to them. If Paralympians are role models let them inspire everybody, able and disabled, rather than be exploited to make disabled people feel inadequate and guiltily dependent on the hard-working taxpayer.
I'm in my 60s now, and there's a limit to what Britain's coalition government can do to me. I worry about the young - those who can no more choose work than choose not to be disabled, but will have their benefits slashed anyway. As a spectacle, the Paralympics might inspire them, but as a symbol of what society thinks disability means, it will hurt them. And sponsored by Atos and welcomed by Prime Minister David Cameron, the Paralympics are in danger of turning into an insult to all of us.