Sign in

Madhya Pradesh HC calls a section of MP Freedom of Religion Act ‘unconstitutional’

The section 10 of the Act mentions that any person who desires to convert shall submit a declaration to that effect, 60 days prior to such conversion, in prescribed form to the district magistrate stating that s/he desires to convert on their free will and without any force, coercion, undue influence or allurement

Updated on: Nov 18, 2022, 16:43:57 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Madhya Pradesh high court has termed a mandatory provision under Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act 2021, according to which the district magistrate must be informed before a person converts, as ‘unconstitutional’ and ordered the state government to not prosecute such citizens.

For representational purposes only. (Getty Images/iStockphoto)
For representational purposes only. (Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Hearing at least seven petitions filed against the Act, the double bench comprising justices Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta said, “A strong prima facie case is made out by the petitioners for grant of interim protection in relation to marriage of two adult citizens on their volition and against any coercive action for violation of Section 10 of the Act of 21 (MP Freedom of Religion Act).”

“Section 10 makes it obligatory for a citizen desiring conversion to give a declaration in this regard to the District Magistrate which in our opinion ex facie, unconstitutional in the teeth of aforesaid judgments of this Court. Thus, till further orders, respondent shall not prosecute the adult citizens if they solemnize marriage on their own volition and shall not take coercive action for violation of Section 10 of Act of 21,” the order read.

The court asked the state to file its response within three weeks. “Parties shall complete their pleadings at the earliest. Liberty is reserved to the parties to file appropriate application seeking out of turn final hearing of this matter after completion of pleadings,” the HC ruled.

The section 10 of the Act mentions that any person who desires to convert shall submit a declaration to that effect, 60 days prior to such conversion, in prescribed form to the district magistrate stating that s/he desires to convert on their free will and without any force, coercion, undue influence or allurement. Any religious priest and/or any person who intends to organise conversion shall give 60 days prior notice to the district magistrate where such conversion is proposed to be organised in such form as may be prescribed.

According to act, whoever contravenes the provisions of sub-section (2) shall be punished with imprisonment for not less than three years, extended up to five years. The person will also be liable to a fine not less than 50,000. No court shall take cognizance of the offence committed under this section without prior sanction of the concerned district magistrate, says the act.

One of the petitioners, LS Hardenia, called the decision the biggest blow to the state government. “We are happy that we will get relief in the overall matter,” he said.

(With inputs from Monika Pandey)

  • Shruti Tomar
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Shruti Tomar

    I have spent over a decade chronicling Madhya Pradesh’s political and social landscape, covering politics, investigative journalism, crime, human interest, and government policy, blending sharp insight with ground‑level depth. I have closely tracked three assembly elections, three Lok Sabha elections, leadership transitions in MP while exposing governance lapses, tender irregularities, and flawed policy rollouts. My reports have revealed gaps in the Cheetah project, irregularities in medical education, rigging in recruitment exams, and loopholes in policy implementation. In crime reporting, I have moved beyond FIRs to map systemic patterns — from organised crime networks and gender‑based violence to custodial accountability — balancing urgency with sensitivity. My journalism is defined by a commitment to human interest. I have profiled the marginalised Bancchda community, documented atrocities against tribal groups, and highlighted efforts to preserve their culture through heritage liquor and revival of spiritual practices. I have reported on farmers struggling with failed MSP promises, giving voice to those often reduced to statistics in policy files. Passionate about field reporting, I have reported on rampant sand mining in Chambal and Narmada, pharmaceutical companies supplying medicines under altered names, the dire condition of schools and colleges, the plight of commercial sex workers, and skewed sex ratios in specific districts. Beyond deadlines, and as HT’s state correspondent and assistant editor in Madhya Pradesh, I engage with ministers, farmers, students, and activists, believing the best policy stories begin with a single human voice. A postgraduate in Journalism and Mass Communication, I also hold a diploma in sports journalism.Read More