MP HC dismisses Congress substitute candidate’s petition to contest from Indore
Madhya Pradesh Indore high court dismisses Congress candidate Moti Singh's petition against rejection of his candidature in Indore, setback for the party.
Bhopal: In a major setback to the Congress party, a division bench of the Madhya Pradesh Indore high court dismissed the petition of a Congress substitute candidate, Moti Singh, filed against rejection of his candidature from Indore.

Singh on April 30 filed a petition to a single bench to accept his nomination after Akshay Kanti Bam withdrew his name as the Congress candidate, but it was rejected following which he approached the division bench.
The Congress candidate from Indore, Bam, withdrew his nomination and joined the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on April 29.
The division bench of judges SA Dharmaadhikari and Gajendra Singh upheld the single bench’s decision, saying, “Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the principles laid down in the case of Election Commission of India (supra) and Manda Jagannath (supra), we find force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents (District administration of Indore and Election Commission of India). When the impugned order is tested, we do not perceive any error therein.”
Also Read: Indore Congress candidate Akshay Kanti Bam withdraws nomination, joins BJP
Singh had submitted his nomination form with an affidavit in the prescribed format as required under the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Rules of 1961’) along with Bam.
Bam was declared as the ‘approved candidate’ and Singh as the ‘substitute candidate’ by issuing Form-B in the prescribed form as mentioned under the Order of 1968.
In the scrutiny of the nomination forms on April 26, the returning officer of Indore rejected Singh’s form on the ground that he was only a ‘substitute candidate’ and Bam had been declared as an ‘approved candidate’.
On April 29, Bam being an approved candidate, withdrew his nomination form to contest the parliamentary elections. As a result, Singh immediately submitted a representation to declare him as the ‘approved candidate’ and allotment of the official symbol of the Congress party, however, the same was not considered.
In the petition, Singh said he was deprived of his legal rights.
His advocate Vibhor Khandelwal argued the writ petition was filed seeking relief that, the instant writ petition may kindly be allowed.
“It is a crystal clear mandate of Section 33(1) of the Act of 1951 that a candidate set up by a recognised political party can submit his nomination form only with one signature i.e. an elector of the constituency as proposer,” said the advocate.
He added, “Therefore, the action of the returning officer rejecting his nomination on April 26 may be correct since at that time the petitioner was not an approved candidate of the INC (Indian National Congress) as also his form was not signed by 10 proposers, but in view of the Proviso to sub Section (5) of Section 36 of the Act of 1951, the returning officer ought to have given a day’s time to the appellant to get signatures of 10 proposers and examine the nomination form next day,” Khandelwal argued.
In the order, the court said, “Moti Singh did not challenge the rejection of nomination at any point in time. Moreover, the directions contained in the Handbook, 2023, and the Order 1968, are not put to challenge by the appellant in the writ petition. Therefore, the contention of learned counsel for the appellant that the statutory provisions would have the overriding effect and the Handbook, 2023 and the Order, 1968 cannot be countenanced.”
The court observed that the learned single judge had rightly passed the impugned order and no interference was warranted.
Singh said he would move the Supreme Court against the high court’s order.
Indore will go to polls in the fourth phase of the ongoing Lok Sabha election on May 13.
ABOUT THE AUTHORShruti TomarI have spent over a decade chronicling Madhya Pradesh’s political and social landscape, covering politics, investigative journalism, crime, human interest, and government policy, blending sharp insight with ground‑level depth. I have closely tracked three assembly elections, three Lok Sabha elections, leadership transitions in MP while exposing governance lapses, tender irregularities, and flawed policy rollouts. My reports have revealed gaps in the Cheetah project, irregularities in medical education, rigging in recruitment exams, and loopholes in policy implementation. In crime reporting, I have moved beyond FIRs to map systemic patterns — from organised crime networks and gender‑based violence to custodial accountability — balancing urgency with sensitivity. My journalism is defined by a commitment to human interest. I have profiled the marginalised Bancchda community, documented atrocities against tribal groups, and highlighted efforts to preserve their culture through heritage liquor and revival of spiritual practices. I have reported on farmers struggling with failed MSP promises, giving voice to those often reduced to statistics in policy files. Passionate about field reporting, I have reported on rampant sand mining in Chambal and Narmada, pharmaceutical companies supplying medicines under altered names, the dire condition of schools and colleges, the plight of commercial sex workers, and skewed sex ratios in specific districts. Beyond deadlines, and as HT’s state correspondent and assistant editor in Madhya Pradesh, I engage with ministers, farmers, students, and activists, believing the best policy stories begin with a single human voice. A postgraduate in Journalism and Mass Communication, I also hold a diploma in sports journalism.Read More

E-Paper


