Sign in

Punjab: 1.36 crore voters to pick rural body representatives today

Polling will commence at 8 am and will continue till 4 pm through the use of ballot papers; vote counting will take place on December 17, they said

Published on: Dec 14, 2025 7:02 AM IST
By , Chandigarh
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

All arrangements are in place for the Zila Parishad and Panchayat Samiti elections in Punjab on Sunday, officials said.

Polling officials carry voting materials before leaving for their respective polling booths on the eve of Zila Parishad and Panchayat Samiti elections in Amritsar on Saturday. (HT Photo)
Polling officials carry voting materials before leaving for their respective polling booths on the eve of Zila Parishad and Panchayat Samiti elections in Amritsar on Saturday. (HT Photo)

Polling will commence at 8 am and will continue till 4 pm through the use of ballot papers, they said. Vote counting will take place on December 17, they said.

A total of 1.36 crore voters are eligible for polling, officials said, adding that over 19,000 booths covering all rural areas of the districts, have been established in the districts.

Elections will be held to elect members of 347 zones of Zila Parishads and 2,838 zones across 153 Panchayat Samitis.

Officials said there were 860 hyper sensitive polling locations while 3,400 sensitive polling locations. They further said around 44,000 police personnel will be deployed for poll duty.

The State Election Commission, Punjab, has said it has appointed election observers and police observers for the polls, adding that it was fully committed to conducting these general elections in a fair and transparent manner.

All major political parties, including Aam Aadmi Party, Congress, Shiromani Akali Dal, Bharatiya Janata Party, Bahujan Samaj Party and SAD (Amritsar) are contesting the polls on party symbols.

The AAP has sought votes for works undertaken by the Bhagwant Mann government. During poll campaigning, the AAP leaders highlighted 300 units of electricity with 90% of households getting zero bills, opening of mohalla clinics and giving government jobs.

In the run-up to the polls, the opposition parties targeted the Mann government, accusing it of using the government machinery in preventing their candidates from filing nomination papers and rejecting them also.

Amid allegations of the misuse of police by the AAP government, a purported audio clip surfaced on social media with SAD president Sukhbir Singh Badal claiming that Patiala senior superintendent of police Varun Sharma and other officers were allegedly conspiring to prevent opposition candidates from filing nominations at the behest of the ruling AAP.

Though police called the purported conference call audio clip as fake AI-generated, this matter reached the Punjab and Haryana high court after Akali leader Daljit Singh Cheema and Congress leader Partap Singh Bajwa filed petitions.

Cheema sought judicial safeguards to ensure free and fair elections in the state while Bajwa demanded extension in the last date for filing nominations, which was December 4, claiming that opposition candidates faced “intimidation and systematic obstruction” in filing nomination papers.

Later, IPS officer Varun Sharma proceeded on leave and the Sangrur SSP was given the additional charge of Patiala SSP.

The high court even asked the State Election Commission, Punjab, to issue directions to all the police personnel deployed in poll duty for elections, to conduct themselves in a non-partisan manner without indulging in any kind of activity deleterious to the concept of free and fair elections.

Following the HC verdict, the commission wrote to the Punjab director general of police, asking him to ensure free and fair polls.

“Recent events where an audio recording of a senior police official in Patiala district went viral, have caused a considerable erosion in the perception of the police fairness and neutrality in the election process. Although no doubt it is a matter now under investigation, such activities give occasion to the general public to distrust the neutrality and unbiasedness of the official machinery, and it takes great effort to restore the public confidence in the election machinery,” the SEC wrote.