Today in New Delhi, India
Nov 14, 2018-Wednesday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

Not in the picture

Anna Hazare's messianic stature owes less to media hype and more to muddled government responses and the public's sense of disaffection with corruption. Rajdeep Sardesai writes.

columns Updated: Dec 29, 2011 21:41 IST
Rajdeep Sardesai
Rajdeep Sardesai
Hindustan Times
Rajdeep Sardesai,Anna Hazare,2011 CNN-IBN Indian of the Year awards

Those who live by the media are often slain by it. At the 2011 CNN-IBN Indian of the Year awards, Anna Hazare candidly admitted that it was the media which was responsible for his rise from a regional figure in Maharashtra into a national icon. "If your cameras had not followed me everywhere, who would know me?" was the activist's honest response.

Today, the same media reports on Hazare's flop show in Mumbai, on how an anti-corruption stir has become an anti-Congress agitation and how Hazare's fasts amount to coercive blackmail. Last week, Mani Shankar Aiyar, the ruling class's last iconoclast, referred to Anna as a "Frankenstein monster", mirroring the views of several politicians who are convinced that Hazare is a media creation threatening parliamentary democracy. But was the media hype really responsible for Hazare's larger-than-life image?

There is little doubt that over the last nine months, Hazare's advisers used the media quite brilliantly. Prime time press conferences, made for TV spectacles, social networking campaigns: Hazare did benefit from saturated media coverage. Yes, some of it was high-pitched, and yes, some journalists did become Hazare's cheerleaders. But to see Hazare as purely a media phenomenon would be a misreading of the mood on the street. Crowds were attracted to Hazare not because the TV cameras were there, but because he appeared the antithesis of a morally bankrupt political leadership beset with a series of scams.

Rewind to April when Hazare first descended on the national capital. Just before the first fast in Jantar Mantar, Hazare addressed a press conference at the Press Club. The attendance was thin, and Anna remained at best an object of curiosity for the national media. Yet, even before the fast could really take off, Union minister Sharad Pawar resigned from the group of ministers on the lokpal, thereby almost vindicating Hazare's claim that a "corrupt" Pawar could not be on an anti-corruption law panel. Two days later, Hazare's cause was further bolstered when the government issued a formal notification in the official gazette, setting up a joint drafting committee that would discuss and draft a strong Lokpal Bill. The members of the committee would be a 50-50 divide of government ministers and a unique concept called 'Team Anna'.

Till April 9, Hazare was just another voice in the ongoing debate over an anti-corruption law. The singular act of agreeing to formally negotiate with his appointees on the lokpal automatically legitimised him and his 'team' as the sole spokespersons for 'civil society'. Suddenly, respected figures like Aruna Roy, Jaiprakash Narayan (of Loksatta) and a number of anti-corruption activists who had also worked hard on the lokpal legislation were confined to the margins. Did the media ask the government to make Team Anna the exclusive interlocutors of civil society, or was this a reflection of a government mindset eager to appease all shades of NGOs and their fellow-travellers? To compound the political error, all nominees on the government side were Congress ministers, effectively making the negotiations a Congress versus Team Anna exercise rather than a wider, more inclusive process.

If April 9 was a bad mistake, what followed on June 5 was another blunder. The Delhi police's midnight crackdown to end Baba Ramdev's fast against black money came barely 72 hours after four senior ministers had rushed to the airport to receive the yoga guru. Treating Ramdev almost like a visiting head of State one moment, then as a criminal the very next, was a flip-flop of the worst kind that further discredited the government.

The third, and perhaps the most serious, error came on August 16 when the Delhi police arrested Hazare as he prepared for a second fast. By first denying him access to the fast venue, and then sending him to judicial custody, the government ensured Hazare's transformation from anti-corruption crusader to martyred messiah. During Hazare's fast in April, a huge Bharat Mata poster had formed the backdrop, with Baba Ramdev sharing stage space and Art of Living guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's supporters providing vocal support. By August, when Hazare fasted at Ramlila Maidan, the Bharat Mata poster had been replaced by a portrait of Mahatma Gandhi, Ramdev had disappeared, and even Sri Sri was a peripheral presence.

Moreover, the arrest provided the trigger for thousands to take to the streets: this was no longer about a lokpal or an anti-corruption law which most Indians knew little about, but an expression of general disaffection with a system that was seen to be arrogant and corrupt. Hazare, as the self-sacrificing 'fakir' like figure was the perfect mascot for the angry, anonymous Indian. The 'I am Anna' caps and T-shirts on sale marked the complete 'personalisation' of the movement: the journey from an environmentalist at Ralegan Siddhi to folk hero at Ram Lila was done. Hazare's triumph appeared complete when Parliament, in a desperate bid to end his fast, passed a hurried 'sense of the House' resolution on the Lokpal Bill. So again the question: did the media push the government to arrest Hazare, or was this also the irrational act of an establishment in panic mode?

In the end, both the State and Team Anna mistook the medium for the message. Team Anna saw the frenzied coverage as its main weapon, forgetting that democratic politics is not a repetitive television serial, but a tortuous process of negotiation and conciliation. The State, on the other hand, failed to recognise that cacophony will be part of a media environment in which there are more than 350 news channels and several hundred OB vans across India. The media will be a loudspeaker of grievances, not just of Team Anna, but of many other protest movements in the future. Strong leaders will not be swayed by the noise, a wise civil society will seek legitimacy beyond the camera lens.

Rajdeep Sardesai is editor-in-chief, IBN 18 Network. The views expressed by the author are personal.

First Published: Dec 29, 2011 21:37 IST