Sign in

We will take fight against crackers to logical conclusion: father of infant petitioner

The order helped bring down the use of crackers in the city this Diwali to some extent. But they feel the journey has not ended yet and there is more to achieve.

Updated on: Oct 21, 2017, 23:31:52 IST
Hindustan Times | By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
Copy link
  • copy link

The fathers of the three infant petitioners, who approached the Supreme Court of India in 2015 against the use of fireworks that pollute the air, are happy with the court’s decision to ban the sale of crackers in Delhi-NCR.

The order helped bring down the use of crackers in the city this Diwali to some extent. But they feel the journey has not ended yet and there is more to achieve. (Sushil Kumar/HT PHOTO)
The order helped bring down the use of crackers in the city this Diwali to some extent. But they feel the journey has not ended yet and there is more to achieve. (Sushil Kumar/HT PHOTO)

The order helped bring down the use of crackers in the city this Diwali to some extent. But they feel the journey has not ended yet and there is more to achieve.

“Though we are happy we managed to achieve something, it is still not the destination for us,” says Amit Bhandari, father of 20-month-old Aarav, who was one of the three infant petitioners.

“Though this Diwali was somewhat better than the previous one, we still have to strive for a much better Delhi,” Bhandari told HT from Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

One of the reasons why Bhandari would move out of Delhi around Diwali was the high pollution levels.

It’s not that I have not burst a single cracker in my life but a few years ago, I realised Delhi as we knew it is a thing of past and it’s the people who are to be blamed,” he said.

Bhandari came to Delhi about 14 years ago.

“My children have had been having cough and cold every other month and their doctor blamed it on pollution. I remember my friends from Mumbai would gush about Delhi’s green cover; now all they talk about is Delhi’s pollution. They avoid coming to Delhi around Diwali,” he says.

“Since we have spoilt Delhi’s air, it’s we who need to make it better, and this court case is a step in that direction as it’s not about just these three kids but deals with a larger issue at hand,” he says.

Apart from Aarav, the other petitioners were Zoya Bhasin (29 months), and Arjun Gopal (18months).

Bhandari feels the people of Delhi need to make an effort to improve Delhi’s air.

“We have to stop looking at courts and it is the people who will have to act sensibly. It is a continuous endeavour and we will pursue this case and take it to its logical conclusion,” he says.

  • Rhythma Kaul
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Rhythma Kaul

    Rhythma Kaul is the national health editor of the Hindustan Times. She has been reporting on public health, medicine, and medical research, with a particular focus on how government decisions and health system reforms shape people’s lives. Rhythma has over 25 years of journalistic experience. She joined Hindustan Times in 2008, and has since covered everything from pandemics and infectious diseases to cutting‑edge medical research and climate‑related health challenges. Her stories routinely track the work of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, department of pharmaceuticals, and key national health programmes, making complex medical science and policy accessible to a wide audience. One of her prominent news breaks has been the 2012 Baby Falak case: A two-year-old brutally battered baby girl was admitted to AIIMS-Delhi with severe head injuries, multiple fractures, human bite marks, and burns. The police investigation revealed this to be a case of multi-state human-trafficking racket. She was profiled by The Wall Street Journal for breaking this story. Rhythma holds a Master’s degree from Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi. Prior to Hindustan Times, she worked with the India Today Group. Rhythma can be contacted at rhythma.kaul@hindustantimes.com. Her X handle is @RamblingBrook.Read More