Sign in

Ex-CJI’s sons lose right to develop prime property

The Delhi High Court on Friday restrained the two sons of former Chief Justice of India Y.K. Sabharwal from selling or developing a 2.70-acre piece of land in Lutyen’s Delhi, which they acquired in April 2010 using controversial judicial orders in their favour.

Updated on: Sep 18, 2010, 01:28:23 IST
Hindustan Times | By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Delhi High Court on Friday restrained the two sons of former Chief Justice of India Y.K. Sabharwal from selling or developing a 2.70-acre piece of land in Lutyen’s Delhi, which they acquired in April 2010 using controversial judicial orders in their favour.

HT Image
HT Image

The 7, Sikandra Road plot originally belonged to Kaula Estate and following a dispute among its co-owners the issue went to the high court, which ordered an auction of the property in August 2006.

Triveni Infrastructure’s offer of R117 crore was the highest bid followed by Prime Commercial’s (R115 crore). But following a series of interventions spanning four years after Triveni failed to fork out the amount within the stipulated date, the court eventually allowed the sale deed to be executed in favour of a subsidiary company of Triveni

Infrastructure, the Sabharwal brothers and Kabul Chawla of real estate company BPTP on April 19, 2010. The land’s current value could top several hundred crores.

A day later, Justice Rajiv Shakdher allowed the plea leading to transfer of the plot in favour of the Sabharwal brothers and Chawla.

On Friday, however, a division bench headed by Justice Vikramjit Sen passed the “status quo” order regarding the title and possession of the property after Prime Commercial moved an application contending it had a vested right in the property because Triveni had defaulted.

On behalf of Prime Commercial, senior counsel Vikas Singh and P.K. Agrawal told the court that despite being strangers to the auction, the Sabharwal brothers — Chetan and Nitin — and Chawla purchased the property.

Vikas Singh cited Delhi HC's September 26, 2006 order that clearly said if the highest bidder defaulted, the bid of the second highest bidder had to be accepted. He alleged in the process Sabharwal's sons and Chawala caused a revenue loss of about R20 crore to the state exchequer as no stamp duty was paid on the deal.

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.