Indirect ways to kill RTI, PMO refuses info on more than one query
Civil society pressure may have forced the government to keep proposed changes in the Right To Information (RTI) Act in abeyance but the information officers are quietly implementing them.
Civil society pressure may have forced the government to keep proposed changes in the Right To Information (RTI) Act in abeyance but the information officers are quietly implementing them.

The government has proposed restrictions on RTI applications that only one issue can be raised in one application and it should not be more than 250 words. But, it had to withdraw amendments following objection by RTI proponents such as National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy.
Maharashtra government became the first state to introduce the proposed amendments silently through changes in the rules and some officers including the one in Prime Minister’s Office has refused to provide information on similar grounds.
The PMO officials asked a RTI applicant Raj Mangal Prasad of NGO Pratidhi to deposit RTI fees separately for each question he had asked. Prasad filed an appeal with transparency watchdog Central Information Commission (CIC), which said: “No request for information can be rejected only on the ground that application fee has not been paid separately”.
There have also been instances in the Central government where the public information officer had refused to provide information on an application seeking a large number of questions. Recently, a public information officer of the Planning Commission refused to accept an application running into about 100 pages and had close to 1,000 questions. “Nobody on earth can provide information on such a lengthy RTI application within the mandated one month,” an official said.
But, the Maharashtra government had gone a step ahead and notified rules that allows a RTI application to be maximum of 150 words.
The rules also say that the government departments will not entertain applications seeking replies on more than one issue. The RTI in Maharashtra has helped to expose several land scams including Adarsh Housing Society scam now being probed by the Central Bureau of Investigation.
The RTI activists are irked at such moves and want the government to kill the RTI law through indirect ways. “The government should try to build consensus rather than harassing RTI applicants,” said Subhash Chandra Aggarwal, a Delhi based RTI activist.
PMO seek separate RTI fee on each query
Civil society pressure may have forced the government to keep proposed changes in the Right To Information (RTI) Act in abeyance but the information officers are quietly implementing them.
The government has proposed restrictions on RTI applications that only one issue can be raised in one application and it should not be more than 250 words. But, it had to withdraw amendments following objection by RTI proponents such as National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy.
Maharashtra government became the first state to introduce the proposed amendments silently through changes in the rules and some officers including the one in Prime Minister’s Office has refused to provide information on similar grounds.
The PMO officials asked a RTI applicant Raj Mangal Prasad of NGO Pratidhi to deposit RTI fees separately for each question he had asked. Prasad filed an appeal with transparency watchdog Central Information Commission (CIC), which said: “No request for information can be rejected only on the ground that application fee has not been paid separately”.
There have also been instances in the Central government where the public information officer had refused to provide information on an application seeking a large number of questions. Recently, a public information officer of the Planning Commission refused to accept an application running into about 100 pages and had close to 1,000 questions. “Nobody on earth can provide information on such a lengthy RTI application within the mandated one month,” an official said.
But, the Maharashtra government had gone a step ahead and notified rules that allows a RTI application to be maximum of 150 words, just 10 words less than the limit for a twitter.
The rules also say that the government departments will not entertain applications seeking replied on more than one issue. The RTI in Maharashtra has helped to expose several land scams including Adarsh Housing Society scam now being probed by the Central Bureau of Investigation.
The RTI activists are irked at such moves and want the government to kill the RTI law through indirect ways. “The government should try to build consensus rather than harassing RTI applicants,” said Subhash Chandra Aggarwal, a Delhi based RTI activist.
ABOUT THE AUTHORChetan ChauhanChetan Chauhan is the National Affairs Editor looking into all aspects of news and features from across India. A Chevening scholar with over three decades of experience in reporting and news management, Chetan has extensively covered all important aspects of the social sector, political economy, environment and climate change nationally and internationally. He did a journalism course at the Reuters Institute of Journalism in Oxford and Digital Media training at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. He started as a reporter with The Statesman in 1996 and joined the Hindustan Times in 2000 in the metro bureau covering environment, crime and Delhi politics. He covered hot local news, from the Jessica Lal murder case to the rebellion of Delhi Congress MLAs against then Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit, to the replacement of toxic vehicle fuel with cleaner compressed natural gas (CNG) in the national capital. Some of his stories on air pollution became part of the Supreme Court’s landmark MC Mehta versus Government of India case in the National Capital Region (NCR), forcing the government to take corrective measures. As part of the national political bureau since 2004, he covered important central sectors such as environment, education, social justice, labour, rural development, water resources, renewable energy, agriculture, broadcasting and the Planning Commission for more than a decade producing several exclusive and investigative breaking stories. His specialisation is the environment, having covered at least a dozen United Nations global conferences on climate change, biodiversity and wildlife including climate summits in Paris, Copenhagen and Bali. He also covered India’s two five-year plans ---11th and 12th and reported on drafting and execution of right based laws such as Right to Education, Right to Information and rural job guarantee law, MG-NREGA, now being introduced in new format as VG-RAM-G Act. He has in-depth knowledge of social sector issues. He was one of the first to report on tigers vanishing from Sariska and Panna wildlife reserves in 2004 and 2008, respectively, leading to the setting up of the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) and the introduction of stringent penal provisions for poaching. He has written extensively on the rising human-animal conflict in India and the degradation of India’s biodiversity hotspots because of mining and other activities. Since 2004, Chetan has covered Parliament comprehensively and participated in training on the nuanced coverage of Parliament proceedings. He has travelled extensively across India to cover national and provincial elections since 1998, especially in the Hindi heartland states, considered India’s road to power. He writes a regular column for Hindustan Times, Ecostani, on important national politics, economy, Himalayan ecology and environmental issues. His other responsibilities include providing inputs for edits and edit page articles for the publication, apart from managing news flow from across India.Read More
Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.

E-Paper


