Sign in

Centre’s stand against minority tag politically motivated: AMU to SC

The NDA government’s decision to withdraw Aligarh Muslim University’s “minority status” is politically motivated, the institution told the Supreme Court on Tuesday, arguing that a mere change of regime at the Centre cannot be the grounds for a decision affecting community members across the country.

Updated on: Aug 17, 2016, 24:18:35 IST
Hindustan Times | By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The NDA government’s decision to withdraw Aligarh Muslim University’s “minority status” is politically motivated, the institution told the Supreme Court on Tuesday, arguing that a mere change of regime at the Centre cannot be the grounds for a decision affecting community members across the country.

The Aligarh Muslim University opposed in the Supreme Court the NDA government’s stand to withdraw the appeal against divesting the varsity of its minority tag. (AMU Facebook Page)
The Aligarh Muslim University opposed in the Supreme Court the NDA government’s stand to withdraw the appeal against divesting the varsity of its minority tag. (AMU Facebook Page)

“The decision taken after the change of government at the Centre by the present NDA government, led by a member of the BJP, does not appear to be a sound decision based on cogent and valid reasons, but one based on political considerations,” read AMU’s affidavit.

It was in response to the Centre’s decision to withdraw the previous UPA government’s appeal against a 2005 Allahabad HC verdict striking down AMU’s minority status.

“The AMU is the oldest Muslim university in the country. Its minority character means a lot to all Muslims,” the varsity said.

The AMU row is a political issue in poll-bound Uttar Pradesh, where Muslims make up around 18% of voters. The BJP is seeking to project it as an example of Muslim appeasement at the cost of scheduled castes, tribes and backward classes — the publicly-funded varsity does not offer them quotas while reserving 50% seats for Muslims.

Defending its move, the government has said a 1981 law giving AMU minority status was erroneous as it was enacted to circumvent a constitution bench judgment that declared AMU a central varsity — which meant it could not be a minority institute.

Urging the Supreme Court not to allow the Centre to withdraw the UPA-era appeal, AMU said such a move would go against parliamentary democracy.

  • Bhadra Sinha
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Bhadra Sinha

    Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.Read More

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.