Lockdown period will not count in insolvency proceedings: Govt

HT Image
HT Image
Published on Apr 25, 2020 11:29 PM IST
Copy Link
ByRajeev Jayaswal, New Delhi

The government has issued two orders that exclude the lockdown period because of the Covid-19 outbreak from any corporate insolvency resolution or liquidation processes, the notifications issued on Friday said.

The first notification said “the period of lockdown imposed by the Central Government in the wake of Covid-19 outbreak shall not be counted for the purposes of the timeline for any activity that could not be completed due to such lockdown, in relation to a corporate insolvency resolution process”.

The second order also excluded the lockdown period “for the purposes of computation of the timeline for any task that could not be completed due to such lockdown, in relation to any liquidation process”.

The law provides for completion of the liquidation process in relation to any corporate person in a limited timeframe, unless extended by the adjudicating authority. Similarly, a model timeline is given within which various IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code) processes should be completed, Gaurav Gupte, partner at law firm Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, said.

The orders will, however, be applicable retrospectively, one government official with direct knowledge of the matter said, requesting anonymity. Although the governing board of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) had taken a decision on these matters on March 27, it could not be immediately notified due to the nationwide lockdown from March 25, the official said.

While the orders mention March 25 as the date from which the lockdown began, they do not mention an end date. As per the home ministry order, the nationwide lockdown is scheduled to last till May 3.

Misha, partner at law firm Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co, said, “It is relevant to clarify that this does not extend the mandatory timelines within the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, such as total time period of insolvency resolution process to be limited to 180 days extendable up to 270 days and only grants relaxations for timelines under the two regulations.”

Experts called it a pragmatic move in line with finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s announcement on March 24, but they also expect a 6-12 months moratorium.

Day before the lockdown, Sitharaman had made a series of announcements to provide relief to the common man and the industry from various compliance provisions that included matters pertaining to IBC.

“Due to the emerging financial distress faced by most companies on account of the large-scale economic distress caused by Covid-19, it has been decided to raise the threshold of default under section 4 of the IBC, 2016, to Rs 1 crore (from the existing threshold of Rs 1 lakh). This will by and large prevent triggering of insolvency proceedings against MSMEs [micro, small and medium enterprises],” she had said in a statement.

“If the current situation continues beyond 30th of April 2020, we may consider suspending section 7, 9 and 10 of the IBC, 2016, for a period of 6 months so as to stop companies at large from being forced into insolvency proceedings in such force majeure causes of default,” the statement said. While sections 7 and 9 pertain to initiation of corporate insolvency proceedings by a financial creditor and an operational creditor, respectively, section 10 relates to filing an application for insolvency resolution by a company.

PTI on Wednesday reported that the Cabinet had decided to amend the insolvency law through an ordinance to suspend these sections provisions that trigger insolvency proceedings against defaulters from six months to one year and allow banks to restructure loans. The ordinance is awaited.

Uday Bhansali, partner at global consultancy firm, Deloitte India, said, “At a time when the focus of the government is to revive economic activity post a future lifting of the lockdown, suspension of IBC for 6 to 12 months removes an element of risk for a company while it is trying to secure necessary financing, renegotiating loans, and attempting to secure other reliefs from banks, especially given the impact of Covid-19.”

“Equally, this needs to also be supplemented by proactive measures to provide MSMEs with additional liquidity, moratorium on past borrowing etc so that they may recover from the enormous dislocation in business,” he added.

The proposed relief from initiating insolvency proceedings for the next six months is expected to provide relief to not only MSMEs, but also big and small firms that may have defaulted on their obligations in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, and would ordinarily fall within the crosshairs of the insolvency regime, Atul Pandey partner at law firm Khaitan & Co, said.

According to Misha, the two notifications issued on Friday have nothing to do with the announcement made by the finance minister on March 24, 2020. “The proposed suspension of Sections 7, 9 and 10 of the Code will have to take effect by passing of an Ordinance by the central government cabinet, followed by Presidential asset in absence of the Parliament being in session,” she said.

Close Story
Story Saved
Saved Articles
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Saturday, December 04, 2021