SC not to restrain govt from using issue of surgical strikes for political gains
A three-judge bench of the apex court dismissed a PIL seeking to restrain the government from using the issue of surgical strikes and other actions of armed forces for political gains.india Updated: Oct 28, 2016 14:37 IST
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking to restrain the government from using the issue of surgical strikes and other actions of armed forces for political gains.
In the PIL, filed by Manohar Lal Sharma, a Delhi-based lawyer, sought the apex court’s direction to the government in this regard.
A three-judge bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice of India Tirath Singh Thakur and comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and L Nageshwar Rao dismissed Sharma’s PIL on the ground that the petition lacked merit, and thus, was baseless.
The India Army conducted surgical strikes along the Line of Control (LoC) on seven Pakistan terror launch pads on the intervening night of September 28-29.
India’s director general military operations (DGMO) Lt. Gen. Ranbir Singh announced that Indian Army had carried out multiple surgical strikes in the wake of the infiltration bids by terrorists along the Line of Control (LoC), including at Uri and Poonch earlier this month.
Although almost all political parties hailed the surgical strike, they asked the government not to thump its chest on the issue to manipulate voters in the wake of assemblies elections in four states, including Uttar Pradesh and Punjab.
First Published: Oct 28, 2016 14:16 IST