SC refuses to order re-exam for NEET-UG 2024, says systematic breach of exam not established
The apex court said it realised that directing a fresh NEET-UG for the present year would be replete with serious consequences.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to order a re-test of NEET-UG 2024, stating that data on record is not indicative of a “systemic leak” of the question paper.
“At the present stage, there is absence of materials on record to show results of the exam was vitiated or there was a systemic breach in the conduct of the exam,” Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, who was heading the apex court bench also comprising justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, said.
“Data on record is not indicative of a systemic leak of the question paper which would indicate a disruption of the sanctity of the exam. The cancellation of NEET is neither justified nor required on the basis of the materials available on record,” the CJI added.
The apex court said it realised that directing a fresh NEET-UG for the present year would be replete with serious consequences which will be for over 24 lakh students who appeared in this exam.
ALSO READ: Over 11,000 NEET-UG candidates scored zero, negative marks
The court was also apprised that Union has formed a seven-member expert committee.

“The committee shall abide by the further directions as may be issued by this court to ensure that the process of conducting NEET UG exam is duly strengthened so that issues cited now does not arise in future,” the bench stated.
ALSO READ: Budget session: Opposition questions govt in Lok Sabha over NEET paper leak case
The National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG) is carried out by the National Testing Agency for admissions to MBBS, BDS, AYUSH and other related courses in government and private institutions across the country.
ALSO READ: Karnataka govt to scrap NEET exam in state, plans to conduct its own test
This year's NEET-UG was conducted on May 5 in which more than 23.33 lakh students had taken the test at 4,750 centres in 571 cities, including 14 overseas.
Earlier in the day, an expert panel from the Indian Institute of Technology-Delhi (IIT-D) had submitted a report on the controversial physics question which the petitioners claimed had two correct answers.
“We have received the IIT Delhi report. The IIT Director Rangan Banerjee...constituted a committee from the department of physics and they say a team of three experts examined the question. They say that the option four is the correct answer,” CJI Chandrachud said.
ABOUT THE AUTHORHT News DeskFollow the latest breaking news, major developments and agenda-setting stories from India and around the world with the newsdesk at Hindustan Times. Operating round the clock, the desk brings together experienced editors, reporters and correspondents to deliver fast, accurate and contextual reporting across subjects that influence public policy, governance, business, society and international affairs. The HT News Desk covers politics, elections, government policies, the economy, business and markets, science and technology, the environment, law and order, infrastructure, education, climate issues and geopolitics, while closely tracking developments across states, institutions and global capitals. The team also leads coverage of major breaking news events, policy announcements, court proceedings, natural disasters, public emergencies and significant international developments. Reports published by the newsdesk are based on information gathered from reporters on the ground, official statements, government agencies, court records, regulatory filings, recognised institutions and other authoritative sources. Stories undergo editorial scrutiny and verification processes to ensure accuracy, fairness and relevance, and are updated as events evolve and additional information becomes available. Whether covering a key political decision in New Delhi, an economic policy shift affecting millions, a landmark court ruling or a major global event, the HT News Desk aims to provide readers with reliable, fact-based journalism that delivers not only the latest developments but also the context and analysis needed to understand their wider implications.Read More

E-Paper


