Sign in

Court to decide on Zakia's petition against clean chit to Modi today

A court in Ahmedabad is likely to deliver its verdict today on Zakia Jafri's protest petition challenging the clean chit to Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and others in the Gulbarg Society massacre case. Timeline: Zakia Jafri vs Modi in 2002 Gujarat riots case

Updated on: Dec 26, 2013, 14:05:47 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Ahmedabad
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

A court in Ahmedabad is likely to deliver its verdict on Thursday on Zakia Jafri's protest petition challenging the clean chit to Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and others in the Gulbarg Society massacre case.

File-photo-of-Zakia-Jafri-the-widow-of-former-Congress-MP-Ehsaan-Jafri-who-was-killed-during-the-Gujarat-riots-speaking-to-a-reporter
File-photo-of-Zakia-Jafri-the-widow-of-former-Congress-MP-Ehsaan-Jafri-who-was-killed-during-the-Gujarat-riots-speaking-to-a-reporter

Zakia's husband, former Congress leader Ehsan Jafri, was among the 69 people of Gulberg Society in Ahmedabad, killed by a mob on February 28, 2002.

The court will decide whether the clean chit granted by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) can be upheld as the SIT found no prosecutable evidence against those named in the Zakia's complaint.

Zakia's lawyers had argued that adequate evidence was available to initiate criminal proceedings against Modi and others, who had allegedly conspired to target the minority community after a Muslim mob torched the Sabarmati Express on 27 February 2002 near Godhra in which 59 kar sevaks were burnt to death.

In the subsequent riots across the state, more than 1,000 people were killed under the watch of Modi administration.

Timeline: Zakia Jafri vs Modi in 2002 Gujarat riots case

In her petition, Zakia has stated that "Modi instructed top officials to allow Hindus to vent their anger on Muslims after the Godhra train burning incident. IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt's affidavit supports this allegation. Modi indulged in hate speeches that amounted to creating enmity between communities. Ministers were posted at police control rooms to interfere with effective police functioning."

Following the September 2011 Supreme Court order, the SIT filed a closure report in the magisterial court in February 2012.

SIT lawyer RS Jamuvar had said that the investigative agency did not find any evidence against Modi and hence the closure report had been filed.

The SIT disregarded the affidavit of Sanjiv Bhatt against Modi.

Follow India news real-time updates and the latest news covered on Hindustan Times, featuring today's critical updates on Sonam Wangchuk LIVE and more across India.