Sign in

Send Sanjay Dutt to jail if you think we broke rules: Maharashtra govt to HC

The bench questioned the decision of the state and prison authorities to grant frequent paroles and furloughs to Sanjay Dutt while he was serving his sentence in Pune’s Yerwada jail.

Updated on: Jul 27, 2017, 15:32:27 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Mumbai
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
Copy link
  • copy link

The Maharashtra government told the Bombay High Court on Thursday that although it had not flouted any norms in remitting actor Sanjay Dutt’s sentence in the 1993 blasts case, yet, if the court disagreed, and detected a mistake, it could order for Dutt to be “sent back to jail“.

The bench has directed the state to file a detailed affidavit within two weeks, explaining the reasons for granting the frequent paroles and furlough and remission to Dutt.File
The bench has directed the state to file a detailed affidavit within two weeks, explaining the reasons for granting the frequent paroles and furlough and remission to Dutt.File

A bench of justices RM Savant and Sadhana Jadhav, however, said that the court had “no such intention,” and that it only wished to affirm that the “due process of law was followed,” in permitting Dutt to walk out of jail eight months before the completion of his five-year sentence.

The bench also questioned the decision of the state and prison authorities to grant frequent paroles and furloughs to Dutt while he was serving his sentence in Pune’s Yerwada jail.

Read: Sanjay Dutt was out on parole half the time, why did govt still release him early: Bombay HC

It noted on one instance, just two months into his sentence, Dutt had been granted parole, and furlough “concurrently” – a practice rarely followed for regular convicts.

Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, who appeared for the state government, however, said the prison authorities and the state government routinely granted parole to most convicts to “encourage good conduct,” and to reward good behaviour.

Kumbhakoni argued he had “searched the origins of the word parole on Google” and affirmed the word indeed meant to offer a reward of sorts.

He argued it was just in cases involving “high-profile convicts, even a day’s delay or remission was made a big deal of”.

The bench has directed the state to file a detailed affidavit within two weeks, explaining the reasons for granting the frequent paroles and furlough and remission to Dutt.

Read: Paroles, furloughs: How Sanjay Dutt walked in and out of jail in 5 yrs

  • Ayesha Arvind
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Ayesha Arvind

    Ayesha Arvind is a Senior Assistant Editor specialising in legal and judicial reportage. She covers High Courts and tribunals across southern India, and believes that important legal developments do not only come from New Delhi. Her work focuses on bringing significant decisions and developments from the region to a wider audience and explaining what they mean beyond the courtroom. She tries to make legal material accessible by translating legal jargon into clear, readable prose and putting pleas, lawsuits, judgments and legal developments in context. She also looks at their political realities and practical consequences for people. Ayesha is committed to the standards of integrity journalism requires. She places a premium on accuracy and fairness, and believes that journalism's powerful voice must be tempered by humility and a sense of proportion. Over almost two decades in journalism, she has covered law and order, civil law, crime and other areas of legal affairs. Her work includes breaking news, legal affairs stories, online analysis and commentary. Ayesha is deeply interested in the law, court judgments and the Constitution because they shape everyday life. She believes every citizen should have a basic understanding of them. What she enjoys most about covering courts is that every story brings something new to learn.Read More