Donald Trump says Iran’s nuclear programme has been obliterated, but then admits what’s left behind could take years to clean up. So which version is true? As the ceasefire clock ticks down, a new phrase has entered the narrative: “nuclear dust.” Trump claims it proves success. But does it actually raise more questions than answers? Because buried beneath the rubble is the rubble: Where is Iran’s enriched uranium? If the sites were destroyed, what happened to the material inside? And if it’s still there, who controls it now? The answers are unclear, and uncertainty is only growing as Washington, Tehran, and even Moscow float competing claims and solutions. From talk of special operations to proposals for third-party storage, the battle is no longer just military, it’s about control. Then there's the diplomacy, which is confusing, contradictory, and constantly shifting. Is the U.S. sending its Vice President to Pakistan or not? Are talks happening now, or tomorrow? Is a deal close, or collapsing? Even within Washington, the messaging doesn’t seem to line up. So here’s the bigger question: is this a calculated strategy…or a situation slipping out of control just as negotiations begin?
E-Paper
