Poor jail conditions, violence cited to avoid extradition from UK to India

Poor jail conditions and alleged threat to human rights are among the grounds cited to oppose extradition of businessman Vijay Mallya.
British courts have a duty to ensure that human rights of the person sought to be extradited under the European Convention of Human Rights will not be breached, among other issues.(File photo)
British courts have a duty to ensure that human rights of the person sought to be extradited under the European Convention of Human Rights will not be breached, among other issues.(File photo)
Updated on May 06, 2018 09:55 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, London | By

Judgements of Indian courts, reports by human rights organisations and media about torture and violence in Tihar and other jails in India have provided material to accused seeking to avoid extradition from Britain to face trial in India.

The latest example is the Friday ruling of the high court, highlighting various lapses in Tihar jail complex, where suspected cricket bookie Sanjeev Chawla would be lodged, if extradited, to face trial for his alleged role in match-fixing during South Africa’s tour of India in 2000.

After the ministry of home affairs submitted detailed sovereign assurances about his safety and regarding facilities available in the jails, the court concluded that there remained a “real risk” to Chawla’s human rights, and raised questions about intra-prisoner violence, overcrowding, and medical facilities.

Poor jail conditions and the alleged threat to human rights are also among the main grounds cited to oppose extradition of businessman Vijay Mallya, whose final hearing is due in July (other grounds are absence of a prima facie case, extraneous consideration and abuse of process).

British courts have a duty to ensure that human rights of the person sought to be extradited under the European Convention of Human Rights will not be breached, among other issues.

Evidence of poor jail conditions presented in British courts include judgements of the Supreme Court of India and other courts, as well as reports by Britain’s Home Office, and organisations such as Amnesty International and the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.

“There is material showing that the capacity at Tihar prison (notwithstanding construction works at some prisons) remains at 10,026 prisoners, but the prison population has increased to 15,161,” the high court said.

“There is evidence showing that the courts in Delhi are investigating outbreaks of violence at Tihar, and there is material suggesting that recordings from CCTV cameras installed.. to ensure that there would be an accurate record of what occurred during outbreaks of violence are not available to those courts.

“There are reports of intra-prisoner violence in high security wards. There is some evidence suggesting that the Tihar prison board of visitors had not been visiting.” the court added.

Much of the evidence on Indian jail conditions in the Chawla and Mallya cases is presented by Alan Mitchell, a prisons expert who visited the Alipore jail in West Bengal some years ago. India refused him permission to visit Tihar jail, but is ready to allow another expert.

The high court also raised questions about India’s second sovereign assurance in Chawla’s case on prison conditions. It was seen as providing a guarantee about space, but attached photographs were not considered clear enough to identify whether what was shown was a cell or a ward.

“The second assurance does not identify whether any of the wards are high security wards, where the evidence shows that there is a real risk of violence. Further, the assurance does not identify whether the toilet facilities will be shared, and if so what those facilities will be,” it said.

“The apparent under recruitment of medical officers is a cause for concern, given the reported difficulties with medical treatment of other extradited persons and the permissible findings of the district judge, but we have noted the assurance that Chawla will have speedy access to prison medical facilities if needed.”

The court gave India 42 days to submit further assurances on the personal space that will be available to Chawla; on toilet facilities; identifying the ways in which he will be kept free from the risk of intra-prisoner violence in the high security wards; and repeating the guarantee of medical treatment.

In Mallya’s case, India has submitted detailed information about the Arthur Road jail in Mumbai, where he is to be lodged, if extradited. New Delhi has also agreed to his accessing private medical healthcare, if needed.


    Prasun Sonwalkar was Editor (UK & Europe), Hindustan Times. During more than three decades, he held senior positions on the Desk, besides reporting from India’s north-east and other states, including a decade covering politics from New Delhi. He has been reporting from UK and Europe since 1999.

Close Story

Less time to read?

Try Quickreads

  • In a letter to Trudeau, the group, Canadian Hindu Volunteers, said the film “deliberately shows (the) Hindu Goddess in a derogatory manner”. (Shutterstock)

    Kaali movie organisers apologise after uproar over ‘offensive’ poster

    The university responsible for curating the programme and the museum that provided it a platform issued an apology on Tuesday after uproar over a film with a poster found offensive by Hindu groups in Canada. On the other hand, York University, where the film's director is studying, has supported Leena Manimekalai's artistic freedom. A spokesperson for the university also said its logo was used on the controversial poster “without permission”.

  • Nearly 100 Sikhs had been removed from their posts for not meeting the ‘clean shave’ requirement. (REUTERS/FILE)

    ‘Clean shave’ directive: Toronto makes an exception for Sikh security guards

    The city of Toronto on Tuesday said it is making an exception to its “clean shave” directive for security personnel posted at shelters impacted by Covid-19, after nearly 100 Sikhs were removed from their posts for not meeting the requirement. Security agencies contracted by the city laid off or transferred Sikhs who refused to shave their beard for religious reasons. The matter was raised by the World Sikh Organisation.

  • British Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

    UK PM Boris Johnson vows to stay in office after top ministers quit

    A defiant British Prime Minister Boris Johnson was battling to stay in power on Wednesday after his government was rocked by the resignation of two top ministers, who said they could no longer serve under his scandal-tarred leadership. Months of discontent over Johnson's judgment and ethics within the governing Conservative Party erupted with the resignations of Treasury chief Rishi Sunak and Health Secretary Sajid Javid within minutes of each other on Tuesday evening.

  • Britain prime minister Boris Johnson (File/Photo by GABRIEL BOUYS/AFP)

    Two more UK ministers resign in fresh blow to PM Boris Johnson

    Two more ministers resigned from the UK government on Wednesday, piling further pressure on Prime Minister Boris Johnson following the departure of his health and finance ministers. Will Quince, minister for children and families, said he had "no choice but to tender my resignation" while junior transport minister Laura Trott said she was quitting over a loss of "trust" in the government.

  • 3M, Honeywell and a few others make N95 and N99 face masks (File)

    Canadian city of Toronto apologises to Sikh security guards over N95 mask row

    The Canadian city of Toronto has apologised to the World Sikh Organization of Canada for any delay' in reinstating Sikh security guards hired by contracted service providers who may have been terminated over a 'no-beard' policy that forced them to choose between their jobs and their faith. A report by the Toronto Sun said over 100 guards had been fired over a rule that requires them to be clean-shaven so they can wear N95 masks.

Story Saved
Saved Articles
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Wednesday, July 06, 2022