Tension with China may drive up private telcos’ 5G rollout costs
The central government’s move asking state-owned BSNL and MTNL not to purchase Chinese-made equipment to upgrade their mobile networks has triggered fear among private firms that they may have to follow suit.
Telecom operators Bharti Airtel Ltd and Vodafone Idea Ltd may be hit hard if they have to substitute Chinese 5G equipment that provide significant cost advantage. Only a handful of companies—Ericsson, Nokia Networks, Samsung, Huawei and ZTE—manufacture 5G equipment. The last two are Chinese.
Industry estimates peg the market for Indian telecom equipment to be around ₹12,000 crore annually, of which Chinese vendors account for roughly a fourth. The rest of the market comprises Sweden’s Ericsson, Finland’s Nokia and Korea’s Samsung. Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea work with both Huawei and ZTE, besides the European vendors, while Reliance Jio works with Samsung.
Reuters reported the government instruction on June 18 saying it was aimed at keeping Chinese telecom gear out of an almost $8 billion plan to help loss-making operators BSNL and MTNL. “Since that plan will be funded by public money, they (BSNL, MTNL) should try to ensure they buy made in India equipment,” the news agency quoted an unnamed person in the government as saying.
Though private telcos have not received official direction to steer clear of Chinese equipment, speculation is rife that they may soon be asked to do so, considering the ratcheting up of measures by India in business and commerce.
On Tuesday, the US formally labelled Huawei and ZTE as threat to national security, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo calling Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Jio Infocomm a “clean telco” for rejecting Huawei.
Telecom sector analysts said the cost of shifting from Chinese telecom equipment is likely to be significant for telcos although not unaffordable.
Mahesh Uppal, a consultant on telecom regulation, said from a 5G perspective, the upfront cost will be a concern if some of the vendors are not given access.
“It is in the best interest of telecom operators to have a vibrant market to choose from,” said Uppal.
Transitioning to a new provider is not a trivial process for telcos, he added.