Sign in

Tussle over animal welfare boils over as SPCA rejects admn takeover bid

A non-governmental organisation (NGO) - Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) - on Friday said it had rejected the UT administration’s takeover bid. Having stopped the funding to the NGO, the administration had formed its own Society for Welfare of Animals (SWA) in March, but was later forced by rules and circumstances to urge the SPCA for a merger.

Updated on: May 16, 2015, 09:08:22 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Chandigarh
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

A non-governmental organisation (NGO) - Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) - on Friday said it had rejected the UT administration’s takeover bid. Having stopped the funding to the NGO, the administration had formed its own Society for Welfare of Animals (SWA) in March, but was later forced by rules and circumstances to urge the SPCA for a merger.


“But their attitude has been of uncertainty. After some initial talks we had agreed for a merger two months ago, but they did not give any commitment on whether or not they would take over our pending liabilities of around `13 lakh. So we withdrew that offer. Ever since, the situation has not changed,”said SPCA president Jasbir Ralhan, blaming “ego of some officials”for the fall-through.

HT Image
HT Image

Both parties had separately agreed to the payoff of the NGO’s liabilities, but Ralhan underlined that in a recent meeting of the SWA, which is chaired by animal husbandry director Prince Dhawan, the payoff offer was mentioned as “subject to approval of the finance department”. That meeting took place two weeks ago, “and we have nothing official on it since”.

Hence, Ralhan said: “We decided at our executive meeting on Thursday evening that we will run the SPCA howsoever we can - for now by contributing money on our own and eventually through donations by showcasing good work.”

Dhawan, when contacted, said he would be able to present his version only after he got any official intimation about it.
The issue had started after the administration - having granted `60 lakh in the past three years alone - stopped funding to the SPCA last year citing factionalism and mismanagement, particularly after Ralhan was elected president. In the absence of funding, staff at the SPCA shelter has remained unpaid for several months, and the illness-afflicted animals too are not getting treatment as the two staff doctors have left. Two dogs are reported to have died in the past fortnight, though Ralhan insists all is fine.

WHO’S THE LOSER?

As for the SWA, headquartered for now at the Sector 38-W government veterinary hospital, it does not have any dedicated premises. “It would have been great if the SPCA had merged with us, as we would’ve got a proper building and other infrastructure,”said an official in the administration.

Ralhan’s conditions for the takeover included that the liabilities be paid off, and certain members from the opposing faction that he had expelled be kept out.

“But at the SWA meeting, minutes of which are with us, they had even said that members would have to apply afresh,”Ralhan said.
HT had reported how both parties were primarily stuck at the question of who would formally mediate. Ralhan had conveyed his conditions to a committee formed by the administration for mediation but wanted top officers to come forth. The officers did not want to get involved as Ralhan has in the past complained about their alleged arrogance. It was also learnt a week ago that a top MC official would hold a meeting “soon”. That has not happened to date.

HANDOVER TO PFA ‘FEARED’

Ralhan also expressed fear that the administration “would have handed over our NGO effectively to the much-powerful NGO People for Animals”, underlining that the local PFA chief Payal Sodhi had been made the head of two sub-committees of the SWA.

Ralhan had last week also received a call purportedly from Union minister Maneka Gandhi, who is the PFA national chairperson, over some alleged irregularities and cruelty to animals at the SPCA’s Sector 38-W facility.

  • Aarish Chhabra
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Aarish Chhabra

    Aarish Chhabra is an Associate Editor with the Hindustan Times online team, writing news reports and explanatory articles, besides overseeing coverage for the website. His career spans nearly two decades across India's most respected newsrooms in print, digital, and broadcast. He has reported, written, and edited across formats — from breaking news and live election coverage, to analytical long-reads and cultural commentary — building a body of work that reflects both editorial rigour and a deep curiosity about the society he writes for. Aarish studied English literature, sociology and history, besides journalism, at Panjab University, Chandigarh, and started his career in that city, eventually moving to Delhi. He is also the author of ‘The Big Small Town: How Life Looks from Chandigarh’, a collection of critical essays originally serialised as a weekly column in the Hindustan Times, examining the culture and politics of a city that is far more than its famous architecture — and, in doing so, holding up a mirror to modern India. In stints at the BBC, The Indian Express, NDTV, and Jagran New Media, he worked across formats and languages; mainly English, also Hindi and Punjabi. He was part of the crack team for the BBC Explainer project replicated across the world by the broadcaster. At Jagran, he developed editorial guides and trained journalists on integrity and content quality. He has also worked at the intersection of journalism and education. At the Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad, he developed a website that simplified academic research in management. At Bennett University's Times School of Media in Noida, he taught students the craft of digital journalism: from newsgathering and writing, to social media strategy and video storytelling. Having moved from a small town to a bigger town to a mega city for education and work, his intellectual passions lie at the intersection of society, politics, and popular culture — a perspective that informs both his writing and his view of the world. When not working, he is constantly reading long-form journalism or watching brainrot content, sometimes both at the same time.Read More