Sign in

MC report suggests ‘brazen violations’ in Bhagirathi eco-sensitive zone

In its report submitted to the state government last month, the committee has recommended action against the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY), contractors and forest officials responsible. PMGSY project was executed by State Rural Road Development Authority (SRRDA)

Published on: Jan 29, 2023, 16:15:17 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Bhagirathi eco-sensitive zone (BESZ)’s monitoring committee (MC) in its latest report has pointed out “brazen violations- road cutting, tree felling, and muck dumping- in BESZ,” causing irreversible damage to the local ecology in Uttarkashi district.

The Bhagirathi Eco-Sensitive Zone covers an areas of 4179.59 sq km from Gaumukh to Uttarkashi (Representative Photo)
The Bhagirathi Eco-Sensitive Zone covers an areas of 4179.59 sq km from Gaumukh to Uttarkashi (Representative Photo)

According to the committee’s 46-page report, accessed by HT, the road was constructed in BESZ without the approval of the monitoring committee and any environmental impact assessment, causing irreparable damage to the environment in Uttarkashi.

Amid the violations, the committee has asked the state government to initiate an inquiry into the role of officials.

Also Read: MoU inked for protection and conservation of Manipur’s Loktak Lake

In its report submitted to the state government last month, the committee recommended action against the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY), contractors and forest officials responsible. PMGSY project was executed by State Rural Road Development Authority (SRRDA).

The report stated that the work on the 6 km road from Bayna-Syaba in Uttarkashi started on the wrong premises, with inadequate submissions, without requisite permissions, and despite stays by the state government and also by the ministry of environment, forest and climate change (MOEF) in 2020.

The report said after the last site visit to the project site in December 2020, the committee noted that a significant forest area was still in its pristine state. “It is for this reason, that an alternate alignment was suggested to be considered by the MC members. However, the alternative route wasn’t considered sincerely and despite the stay order on the project, the works and consequent ecological damage carried out surreptitiously was with the intention that the project would become a fait accompli,” the report mentioned.

“The user agency– PMGSY, has been blatant and brazen in their action and has carried out road-cutting, tree felling and muck dumping in violation of all laws of land causing irreversible damage to the local ecology. It is an unlawful and arrogant action by the PMGSY,” said the report.

The matter came to light following a complaint in 2020 to the state government and a survey report given to the local forest range officer by the Van-Daroga which stated “unauthorized muck dumping by the contractors and loss of trees at four sites in the area.”

Also Read: Assam Rifles engages in ‘minor confrontation’ with NSCN (IM) in Nagaland forest: Report

In April 2020, with regards to the construction of the Bayana–Syaba road stretch, the residents of the area raised a complaint stating that the work for this road stretch was being done in violation of the BESZ guidelines and the debris is being illegally dumped in Andrigad water stream.

According to the report, during the site visit in November 2022 for another survey, the MC members were coerced and intimidated towards approving this stretch since the work was “almost done.”

“The members were aghast looking at the amount of work done since the last site visit and the blatant cutting, the fresh tree felling and muck dumping in the Andrigad – all of which was proof of persistent, obvious and brazen violations by the user agency. All violations were vehemently denied by the PMGSY,” the report mentioned.

The report while terming the overwhelming violations on the Byana-Syaba road stretch as grave and alarming, which need immediate and urgent attention, further recommended immediate next steps and action to be taken in the next three months before the next meeting.

The report has recommended strict action against the violators, including PMGSY officials, contractors, and forest officials and advised carrying out an independent geological survey of the area by an institute such as the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology for mitigation measures to be adopted.

According to a Garhwal-based environmentalist, on the condition of anonymity said, “Interestingly while Joshimath and several other areas are sinking, BESZ is still safe and secure with the least number of landslides or land subsidence related issues even though it is just as fragile. Prevention of mega projects owing to the notification has helped in protecting this area.”

Also Read: Climate tipping points in Amazon, Tibet ‘linked’: Scientists

Puneet Tomar, divisional forest officer (DFO) Uttarkashi said that the forest department on its part has taken action against the executing agency PMGSY from time to time for violations. “Now after the MC report, I am also preparing a fresh report based on the issues raised in the report and the same will be submitted before the regional empowered committee of the project.”

Abhishek Ruhela, member secretary of the monitoring committee and district magistrate Uttarkashi said that after the MC report was submitted, chief secretary SS Sandhu directed the SRRDA chief executive officer Udayraj Singh to conduct a fact-finding investigation on the points raised in the report.

SRRDA chief executive officer Udayraj Singh said he has directed SRRDA chief engineer RP Singh to conduct an investigation into the matter and submit a report.

Singh, who is the chief engineer and deputy CEO of SRRDA, said he is looking into all the points raised by the committee, especially why the work on the road was carried out when the state government and MOEF stayed in 2020.

  • Neeraj Santoshi
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Neeraj Santoshi

    Neeraj Santoshi is the Chief of Bureau for Hindustan Times in Uttarakhand, where he leads the state reporting team while covering government, politics, environment, wildlife, Uttarakhand High Court, and issues shaping the Himalayan region. With more than two decades in journalism across conflict zones, he has covered politically sensitive regions and environmentally fragile landscapes, and focused on stories that combine public interest with in-depth storytelling. An alumnus of Pune University with a Master’s in Communication Studies, he has reported extensively from Jammu & Kashmir (2003-2010), Madhya Pradesh (2010 to 2018 ) and Uttarakhand (Since 2018), covering subjects ranging from insurgency, elections and governance to wildlife conservation, mining, climate change, agriculture, human rights and social justice. He has covered politics and legislative assemblies of both Jammu & Kashmir and Madhya Pradesh over more than a decade. Before taking over as Chief of Bureau in Uttarakhand, he served as Special Correspondent with Hindustan Times in Madhya Pradesh and earlier reported for both Hindustan Times and The Indian Express in Jammu & Kashmir, where he covered state politics, environment and insurgency-related developments. Over the years, his stories have focused on environmental degradation, wildlife, illegal mining, governance and the changing social fabric of Himalayan states and Central India. He is particularly interested in long-form explanatory journalism, and stories that explore the intersection of ecology, conservation, governance and society. Outside the newsroom, Neeraj enjoys reading widely on neuroscience, consciousness studies, Artificial Intelligence and quantum physics, with a special interest in Kashmiri Tantric Shaivist traditions. He is also passionate about wildlife, mountaineering and the Himalayas, interests that continue to inform his reporting and deepen his understanding of the region he covers.Read More