Sign in

Mass conversion racket: Allahabad HC denies bail to Umar Gautam, four others

Gautam had moved the high court earlier this year after his bail plea was rejected by the court of additional district and sessions judge, NIA/ATS, in May

Published on: Dec 17, 2022, 22:09:58 IST
By , Lucknow
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court on Friday (December 16) rejected bail applications of Umar Gautam, his son and three other accused in a case related with illegal mass conversion.

An FIR was lodged by UP ATS on June 20, 2021 at Gomti Nagar police station in Lucknow against Umar Gautam and others. (For Representation)
An FIR was lodged by UP ATS on June 20, 2021 at Gomti Nagar police station in Lucknow against Umar Gautam and others. (For Representation)

The special task force (STF) of Uttar Pradesh Police had arrested Gautam last year for allegedly running a mass conversion racket across the state. Those denied bail are Umar Gautam, his son Abdulla Umar, Rahul Ahmad alias Rahul Bhola, Salahuddin and Mohammad Salim.

Gautam had moved the high court earlier this year after his bail plea was rejected by the court of additional district and sessions judge, NIA/ATS, in May. Appearing on behalf of the state government, government advocate SN Tilhari opposed the bail of all five accused.

While denying bail to Gautam and others, a division bench of Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Saroj Yadav observed: “Keeping in mind the act and conduct of the appellant, it cannot be said that he is innocent. On the other hand, evidence collected during of course of investigation by Anti- Terrorist Squad (ATS) and charge sheet submitted against the appellant, reflects that he was carrying-on anti-national activities with the help of anti-social elements,” added the court.

The court also pointed out that their act was for achieving nefarious design that would weaken the social fabric of the country and developed and spread hatred amongst people of different religions that would disturb the public tranquillity and public order.

“He (Umar Gautam) has also received huge sum of money in his personal accounts from different sources including foreign countries,” said the court. “Considering the contention of the learned State Counsel that if the appellant is released on bail, there is every likelihood that he would again indulge in such activities, which would be prejudicial to the national integration of the country,” the court observed. “Hence we do not find any good ground for enlarging the appellant on bail, which is accordingly refused,” the court said.

A first information report was lodged by the UP ATS on June 20, 2021 at Gomti Nagar police station in Lucknow under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including the Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, against Umar Gautam, Islamic Dawah Centre (IDC) chairman Mufti Qazi Jahangir Qasmi and unknown persons.

  • Pawan Dixit
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Pawan Dixit

    Pawan Dixit, Assistant Editor, brings over 20 years of frontline reporting experience to the newsroom. A specialist on Uttar Pradesh politics and governance, he has reported from the ground across the state’s most consequential stories. He cut his teeth in eastern UP, spending 15 years covering the region. Based in Varanasi, he reported the 2012 UP Assembly polls and the 2014 Lok Sabha elections that reshaped the state’s political map. Moving to Lucknow in 2016, he has since led coverage of the 2017 and 2022 UP Assembly elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. His reporting tracks the BJP’s strategy, opposition moves, and voter sentiment across all 75 districts. Pawan has been a constant presence in Ayodhya since 2016. He reported the entire arc of the Ram Mandir movement — from the legal fight to the Supreme Court verdict, through temple construction, to the inauguration. He continues to track every development at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. On the state beat, he covers the BJP, the Industrial Development Department, and handles key outstation political assignments. He also reports major cases from the district court, Lucknow bench of the High Court, and the State Information Commission. Along with this, he also reports on NGT's important decisions related to UP. Known for sharp sourcing and clear analysis, Pawan connects politics, policy, infrastructure and faith — the forces driving UP today. He has reported developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir movement since 2016. The Supreme Court's Ram Mandir verdict, temple construction and the its opening have been reported by him. He reports all developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir Trust. He covers state BJP, Industrial development department, outstation political assignments, reports special cases from district court, high court and state information commissionRead More