Ajay Katara not poisoned: doctor
Deposing as a defence witness in the Nitish Katara murder case, a Ghaziabad-based doctor on Friday told a court here that key prosecution witness Ajay Katara, who was recently hospitalised, was not poisoned.
In a bid to prove Katara an unreliable witness, accused Vikas Yadav produced Deepak Agarwal, a doctor who had treated Katara recently at Pannalal Shyamlal hospital at Ghaziabad, before Additional Sessions Judge Ravinder Kaur. “After going through the medical reports, I can say that it was not a case of poisoning,” Agarwal said, while recording his statement as a defence witness.
Katara had recently lodged an FIR against D.P. Yadav, a controversial UP politician and father of main accused Vikas Yadav and others for allegedly trying to eliminate him by poisoning. Agarwal, during his cross-examination, said that Katara, who was brought to the hospital on July 11 this year, did not consent to “stomach suction”, a necessary process in a poisoning case. Discrediting Agarwal as a witness, Public Prosecutor B.S. Joon, however, claimed that the doctor, at the instance of two Ghaziabad-based politicians, fabricated Ajay Katara’s medical records. In response, Agarwal said: “It is incorrect to suggest that I have manipulated the MLC report of Ajay Katara at the instance of Yatinder Nagar and Nand Kishore Gujjar.”
“The Sahibabad police, despite the medical report that the case was not that of poisoning, lodged the FIR,” the prosecutor claimed, alleging the hospital records were incomplete and forged.
Enter your email to get our daily newsletter in your inbox
- An HT analysis of the profile of snatchers arrested in Delhi between 2018 and 2020 shows that more than 90% of those arrested were caught for the first time, and did not have any criminal record until then. Police registered them as “first-time offenders”.
- A pavement establishment rich in character.
- Additional sessions judge Amitabh Rawat questioned the police’s case as to how the offence of attempt to murder can be made out against accused Imran and Babu, when the victim himself is absent from the police investigation and has never been seen by the police.
- Under section 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), the investigating agency has to take prior sanction from the state government to prosecute any individual for sedition.
- In a statement issued later, the Delhi government said the funds have been allocated for scholarships to SC/ST/OBC communities, Ladli Scheme, aid and equipment for children with special needs and for augmentation of library infrastructure in Delhi government schools.