New Delhi -°C
Today in New Delhi, India

Jun 03, 2020-Wednesday
-°C

Humidity
-

Wind
-

Select city

Metro cities - Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata

Other cities - Noida, Gurgaon, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Bhopal , Chandigarh , Dehradun, Indore, Jaipur, Lucknow, Patna, Ranchi

ADVERTISEMENT
Home / Entertainment / Karan Johar moves high court against I-T notice

Karan Johar moves high court against I-T notice

Film producer Karan Johar has moved the Bombay high court to challenge a notice issued by the Income Tax (I-T) Department, which states that more than Rs 2 crore in profits from his film Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna’s 2006 release was not disclosed.

entertainment Updated: Mar 02, 2013 15:28 IST
HT Correspondent
HT Correspondent
Hindustan Times
Karan-Johar-arrives-in-his-favourite-black-suit-at-Hyatt-in-Mumbai-for-Colors-4th-anniversary-celebrations
Karan-Johar-arrives-in-his-favourite-black-suit-at-Hyatt-in-Mumbai-for-Colors-4th-anniversary-celebrations( )

Film producer Karan Johar has moved the Bombay high court to challenge a notice issued by the Income Tax (I-T) Department, which states that more than Rs 2 crore in profits from his film Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna’s 2006 release was not disclosed.

According to the petition, the assistant commissioner of income tax, circle 31, issued the notice on March 20, 2012 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act (issue of notice where income has escaped assessment) to reopen the film producer’s assessment for the year 2006-07.

“I have reason to believe that income of Rs 2 crore plus has escaped assessment,” the notice said. Johar had declared an income of Rs 14.73 crore for that financial year, which included his earnings from the film.

However, the assistant commissioner said his investigation found the film reported earnings of Rs 70.1 crore, while the total cost of production was Rs 57.44 crore. He added that Johar did not furnish the complete details of his expenditure on the film.

Johar has sought to squash the notice and the actions taken by the I-T department on the order, saying the assistant commissioner had no reason to believe he had withheld information and hence the notice itself was illegal.

A division bench of justice Dhananjay Chandrachud and justice Amjad Sayed will hear the petition on March 6.

ht epaper

Sign In to continue reading