Supreme Court allows Centre to replace MCI oversight committee | india news | Hindustan Times
  • Friday, Jul 20, 2018
  •   °C  
Today in New Delhi, India
Jul 20, 2018-Friday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Supreme Court allows Centre to replace MCI oversight committee

A five-judge Constitution bench gave the Centre liberty to replace any doctor in the list with another if he does not wish to be a part of the oversight committee.

india Updated: Jul 18, 2017 13:40 IST
Press Trust of India, New Delhi
Supreme Court,Medical Council of India,MCI row
The Supreme Court had on July 13 agreed to set up a five-judge constitution bench to deal with the matter after senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi had said it was an urgent matter as counselling for admissions in MBBS and BDS was underway.(HT File Photo)

The Supreme Court allowed the Centre on Tuesday to replace the oversight committee set up to supervise the functioning of the Medical Council of India (MCI) with a fresh panel of five eminent doctors.

A five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar, said the Centre had proposed the names of five doctors to replace the oversight committee whose term had just expired.

“The doctors proposed are all outstanding people. We are satisfied with the names,” the bench, also comprising Justices J Chelameswar, RK Agrawal, DY Chandrachud and S Abdul Nazeer, said.

It also gave the Centre liberty to replace any doctor in the list with another if he does not wish to be a part of the oversight committee.

The bench asked the Centre on Monday to constitute a panel which would replace the oversight committee set up last year by the apex court to oversee the MCI’s functioning till the government put in place an alternate mechanism.

The committee, set up by the court on May 2 last year, was to function for a period of one year or till a suitable mechanism was brought in by the Centre to substitute it.

During the hearing, senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, appearing for some medical colleges, had told the bench that to date, no alternative mechanism had been put in place by the Centre despite the fact that the oversight panel was to function for only one year or till a suitable mechanism was evolved.

He had argued that the MCI was bound by directions of the oversight committee but the council was not adhering to them.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, had said the tenure of the oversight committee should be extended by one more year or till the time the Centre comes out with a mechanism to deal with the issues relating to the MCI’s functioning.

The SC had on July 13 agreed to set up a five- judge constitution bench to deal with the matter after Rohatgi had said it was an urgent matter as counselling for admissions in MBBS and BDS was underway.

The Centre had earlier told the apex court that it had taken steps to put the alternative mechanism in place and there was no need now for the oversight committee to continue.

MCI had contended that the directions of the constitution bench which had set up the oversight committee were based on certain material which could not be controverted at the time of the order.