Supreme Court to deliver verdict on Section 377 tomorrow | india news | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Sep 07, 2018-Friday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Supreme Court to deliver verdict on Section 377 tomorrow

Categorised as an unnatural offence, consensual sexual intercourse between persons of same-sex is termed ‘against the order of nature’ under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and can be punishable by life imprisonment.

india Updated: Sep 05, 2018 17:38 IST
HT Correspondent
HT Correspondent
Hindustan Times, New Delhi
Section 377,Section 377 verdict,Gay sex
(HT File Photo)

The Supreme Court is likely to pronounce its verdict on pleas challenging the validity of the Indian Penal Code’s section 377 criminalising consensual gay sex on Thursday.

A five judge constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, had reserved its verdict on July 17.

The Centre, which had initially sought adjournment for filing its response to the petitions, had later left to the wisdom of the court the issue of legality of the penal provision with regard to the aspects of criminalising consensual unnatural sex between two consenting adults.

The Centre had said that the other aspects of the penal provision dealing with minors and animals should be allowed to be remain in the statute book.

Section 377 refers to ‘unnatural offences’ and says whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to pay a fine.

The issue of section 377 was first raised by an NGO, Naaz Foundation, which had in 2001 approached the Delhi High Court that had decriminalised sex between consenting adults of the same gender by holding the penal provision “illegal”.

This 2009 judgement of the high court was overturned in 2013 by the apex court which had also dismissed a review plea. It had in 2013 restored the criminality of the sexual relationship between persons of the same sex, after the Delhi High Court’ had decriminalised it in 2009.

The five-judge bench on July 10 had made it clear that it was not going into the curative petitions and would adjudicate on fresh writ petitions in the matter.

The writ petitions were opposed by the Apostolic Alliance of Churches, Utkal Christian Association and some other NGOs and individuals including Suresh Kumar Kaushal who had also challenged the 2009 verdict of the high court in the apex court.

(With PTI inputs)

First Published: Sep 05, 2018 17:17 IST