Will oppose entry of ‘creamy layer’ criteria in quota for SCs/STs: NDA ally
"The reservation for SCs/STs is based on caste. We will strongly oppose any move to apply the criteria of creamy layer," said Ramdas Athawale.
Union minister Ramdas Athawale on Friday opposed any move to apply the “creamy layer” criteria to reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) days after the historic Supreme Court verdict on sub-classifications within these communities for broader quota benefits.

"The reservation for SCs/STs is based on caste. The Republican Party of India (Athawale) will strongly oppose any move to apply the criteria of creamy layer to reservation for SCs and STs," said Athawale, whose party is part of the BJP-led NDA.
ALSO READ- Keeping up with UP | SC ruling ‘vindicates’ Rajnath’s 2001 stand on quota within quota
A seven-judge constitution bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, ruled on Thursday with a 6:1 majority that states can further sub-classify SCs and STs to ensure quotas for the most disadvantaged castes within these groups. Four of the six judges supporting this decision wrote separate judgments suggesting the exclusion of the creamy layer from reservation benefits.
The Minister of State for Social Justice and Empowerment welcomed the Supreme Court's decision, stating it would provide justice to the more backward castes within SCs and STs. He also called for similar sub-classifications for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and general category members.
Supreme Court justice B.R. Gavai said that states must develop a policy to identify the creamy layer among SCs and STs and exclude them from reservation benefits.
Read here: Supreme Court verdict seeks policy to define ‘creamy layer’ in SC/ST quota
"When the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney decided that applying such a test for OBCs would promote equality as per the Constitution, why shouldn't this test also apply to SCs and STs?" he asked.
The creamy layer refers to individuals above a certain income level— ₹8 lakh per annum for OBCs—who are excluded from quota benefits.
Read more: Quota hike: Bihar govt keeps fingers crossed despite SC refusing to stay HC order
Chief justice Chandrachud and justices Vikram Nath, Pankaj Mithal, Manoj Misra, and Satish Chandra Sharma supported Justice Gavai's opinion.
(Inputs from PTI)
ABOUT THE AUTHORHT News DeskFollow the latest breaking news, major developments and agenda-setting stories from India and around the world with the newsdesk at Hindustan Times. Operating round the clock, the desk brings together experienced editors, reporters and correspondents to deliver fast, accurate and contextual reporting across subjects that influence public policy, governance, business, society and international affairs. The HT News Desk covers politics, elections, government policies, the economy, business and markets, science and technology, the environment, law and order, infrastructure, education, climate issues and geopolitics, while closely tracking developments across states, institutions and global capitals. The team also leads coverage of major breaking news events, policy announcements, court proceedings, natural disasters, public emergencies and significant international developments. Reports published by the newsdesk are based on information gathered from reporters on the ground, official statements, government agencies, court records, regulatory filings, recognised institutions and other authoritative sources. Stories undergo editorial scrutiny and verification processes to ensure accuracy, fairness and relevance, and are updated as events evolve and additional information becomes available. Whether covering a key political decision in New Delhi, an economic policy shift affecting millions, a landmark court ruling or a major global event, the HT News Desk aims to provide readers with reliable, fact-based journalism that delivers not only the latest developments but also the context and analysis needed to understand their wider implications.Read More

E-Paper


