BJP, Congress opposed ecology protection plan in Uttarakhand
The Union environment and forests ministry's plan to declare regions eco-sensitive zone was opposed by both BJP and Congress in Uttarakhand who said it would hamper progress. Chetan Chauhan reports.
Uttarakhand is fragile. And it is not just the recent calamity that brought this fact to fore. More than three years ago, the Union environment and forests ministry had first pitched a plan to declare swathes of the hill state ecologically sensitive, a move that would have put a stop to major construction activity.

Three years later, in a 2012 notification, the ministry declared a 100km stretch around river Bhagirathi (Ganga in the upper reaches) from Gaumukh to Uttarkashi as eco-sensitive zone.
This did not go well with the strong hydel lobby - a group that has both public and private sector players, activists say.
And that the state assembly unanimously opposed the notification lends credence to the notion that politicians played an active role in weakening the ecology, at the behest of power sector majors. Consequently, the ban is not in effect.
The notification prohibited any change in land use. It outlawed the use of horticultural or agricultural land and tea gardens for any other project (exceptions being roads, tourism and man-made heritage projects). It clearly prohibited river valley mining, poultry farming, use of plastic bags and setting up sewage treatment plants.
The ban, if it came into force, would have covered only a fringe of the upper reaches of Uttarakhand and excludes present epicentre of devastation --- Alakananda and Mandakini rivers.
"The state has a different view on the notification and the chief minister feels it will come in the way of development," environment and forest minister Jayanthi Natarajan said.
"In a democracy, we have to discuss things. However, I believe this is not the time to bring those issues to the fore. I think all of us have to join hands to ensure relief and rescue and to make sure all people are safe," she said.
The notification was the fall-out of a decision by a Group of Ministers headed by then finance minister Pranab Mukherjee, which scrapped two Central hydel projects on the Bhagirathi river.
They were Loharinag Pala and Pala Maneri hydel projects and also decided to declare the Bhagirathi river stretch from Gaumukh to Uttarkashi as an ecologically sensitive area.
The then BJP government opposed the decision to declare eco-sensitive zones and the incumbent Congress government maintained the same stance.
"The powerful hydel lobby does not want any obstruction in its mission to devastate the hills," said Mallika Bhanot, who is associated with Save Ganga campaign.
But environmentalists appear isolated in this regard. The locals, too, oppose the notification.
"Once the rescue work is over, we will stage protest at Jantar Mantar as decided earlier. We will not allow the notification to hamper development of our people," Vijay Pal Singh Sajwan, an MLA from Gangotri, said.
ABOUT THE AUTHORChetan ChauhanChetan Chauhan is the National Affairs Editor looking into all aspects of news and features from across India. A Chevening scholar with over three decades of experience in reporting and news management, Chetan has extensively covered all important aspects of the social sector, political economy, environment and climate change nationally and internationally. He did a journalism course at the Reuters Institute of Journalism in Oxford and Digital Media training at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. He started as a reporter with The Statesman in 1996 and joined the Hindustan Times in 2000 in the metro bureau covering environment, crime and Delhi politics. He covered hot local news, from the Jessica Lal murder case to the rebellion of Delhi Congress MLAs against then Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit, to the replacement of toxic vehicle fuel with cleaner compressed natural gas (CNG) in the national capital. Some of his stories on air pollution became part of the Supreme Court’s landmark MC Mehta versus Government of India case in the National Capital Region (NCR), forcing the government to take corrective measures. As part of the national political bureau since 2004, he covered important central sectors such as environment, education, social justice, labour, rural development, water resources, renewable energy, agriculture, broadcasting and the Planning Commission for more than a decade producing several exclusive and investigative breaking stories. His specialisation is the environment, having covered at least a dozen United Nations global conferences on climate change, biodiversity and wildlife including climate summits in Paris, Copenhagen and Bali. He also covered India’s two five-year plans ---11th and 12th and reported on drafting and execution of right based laws such as Right to Education, Right to Information and rural job guarantee law, MG-NREGA, now being introduced in new format as VG-RAM-G Act. He has in-depth knowledge of social sector issues. He was one of the first to report on tigers vanishing from Sariska and Panna wildlife reserves in 2004 and 2008, respectively, leading to the setting up of the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) and the introduction of stringent penal provisions for poaching. He has written extensively on the rising human-animal conflict in India and the degradation of India’s biodiversity hotspots because of mining and other activities. Since 2004, Chetan has covered Parliament comprehensively and participated in training on the nuanced coverage of Parliament proceedings. He has travelled extensively across India to cover national and provincial elections since 1998, especially in the Hindi heartland states, considered India’s road to power. He writes a regular column for Hindustan Times, Ecostani, on important national politics, economy, Himalayan ecology and environmental issues. His other responsibilities include providing inputs for edits and edit page articles for the publication, apart from managing news flow from across India.Read More

E-Paper


