Today in New Delhi, India
Mar 26, 2019-Tuesday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

We need zero tolerance

India urgently needs an intelligence-driven counter-terror organisation. Maroof Raza and Pathikrit Payne write.

india Updated: Aug 09, 2012 22:33 IST
Maroof Raza and Pathikrit Payne
Maroof Raza and Pathikrit Payne

If the recent bicycle blasts in Pune had worked to plan, they would have taken scores of lives. Fortunately, they didn’t. But their message is loud and clear: terror groups can still strike anywhere in India — except at well-protected government buildings — with ease and impunity. And while the investigators piece together the evidence of who is behind it — with the Pakistani proxy Indian Mujahideen, heading the list — the bigger question is: How well prepared are we in India to deal with terror attacks? The answer: Barely so.

Following the horrific attack on Mumbai on November 26, 2008, the home ministry had apparently put together several initiatives to counter a Mumbai 2. And it is argued that if the scale and frequency of attacks within India since then is anything to go by, then there is reason to believe many of these measures have worked. In reality, though, we’ve been plain lucky, since our policemen are ill-equipped and still have little or no training.

Moreover, the urgency to use technology to improve policing is absent.

Take the case of Pune. The Pune police had demanded 837 CCTVs, but only 79 are installed in the city, of which half are not working. And those that work aren’t monitored. Since the story is the same, or even worse, in most of our cities, terrorists can strike in any other Indian city at will.

What can be done? In simple terms, India’s leadership must urgently do three things: i) put public interest first and have the political will to deal with terrorism emanating both from within and outside as a national threat; ii) ensure that the policeman on the ground is trained and equipped to deal with the threats of today, not of the 19th century. Make the police independent of political interference; and (c) improve intelligence gathering — the key to preventing future attacks — by creating better synergy among our intelligence agencies.

Much has been written about the intelligence failure, which led to the 26/11 attacks. Although there were several agencies in India looking into the various facets of terrorism, such as the Intelligence Bureau (IB), the National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO), and, of course, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), most of them were — and still are — disparate islands in an ocean. There is little trust among them and bureaucratic tangles and organisational turf wars are common. Thus, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) was created in the aftermath of 26/11, primarily to investigate a terrorist attack.

But the big idea of a National Counter-Terrorism Centre (NCTC) was shot down by recalcitrant state governments by citing it as a threat to the federal nature of our polity. In reality, they feared the erosion of their turf, especially in dealing with Maoists and minority groups, a potential political vote bank. National interest was of little interest to them.

In fact, the NCTC apart, what India needs today is an integrated National Security Agency, which should ideally have within it necessary pillars of investigation — intelligence, analysis and special operations capabilities, all integrated as one, by making the IB, RAW, NTRO, NIA, NCTC, and even National Security Guard (NSG) a part of an integrated national agency through a statute of Parliament.

Currently, all we have is a National Security Advisor, an Indian Foreign Service (ISF) fief, and his National Security Council secretariat. What India needs is an intelligence-driven counter-terror organisation, on the lines of America’s Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which terms itself as “an intelligence-driven and a threat-focused national security and law enforcement organisation” with a mandate “to protect and defend the United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats”, created by US federal statutes, transparent and accountable to American lawmakers.

Moreover, through the US Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the FBI is mandated to hunt and bring to justice killers of US citizens hiding abroad. But this applies only for the enemies of the US, not to those on India’s most-wanted list. For this, we need to make a ‘can-do’ list on how we could punish those who have taken countless Indian lives. India must deal with terrorists with ruthless efficiency. It should abandon the moral high ground with those abroad by adopting a policy of ‘no tolerance’. If the US can announce a $10 million award for Hafiz Saeed, what stops India from offering even more?

Maroof Raza and Pathikrit Payne are with Security Watch India, a counter-terrorism initiative

The views expressed by the authors are personal

First Published: Aug 09, 2012 22:31 IST