[

review petition

]

Roshni land scam:File action taken report before December 11: J&K HC to CBI

Hearing of the review petition was earlier scheduled to be taken up on December 16
(Representative Image/HT File Photo)
(Representative Image/HT File Photo)
Updated on Dec 09, 2020 12:54 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times/Jammu | ByRavi Krishnan Khajuria, Jammu

In festival season, exercise due caution

India is at the crossroads. If caution is not exercised and safety protocols are not followed, as the experience in other countries and in Kerala during Onam celebrations has shown, the numbers could shoot up again.
A view of a Durga Puja pandal, New Delhi(Sanchit Khanna/HT PHOTO)
A view of a Durga Puja pandal, New Delhi(Sanchit Khanna/HT PHOTO)
Published on Oct 20, 2020 06:42 PM IST
Copy Link

SC to hear on Friday review petition for NEET, JEE postponement

On August 17, a three -judge bench headed by justice Arun Mishra had rejected a plea by 11 NEET/JEE candidates seeking postponement of the exams until after the Covid-19 crisis has passed.
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court will hear the review petition.(HT PHOTO)
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court will hear the review petition.(HT PHOTO)
Published on Sep 04, 2020 12:29 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByMurali Krishnan

Supreme Court dismisses Vijay Mallya’s review plea against 2017 contempt verdict

Vijay Mallya was found guilty by the apex court on May 9, 2017 for transferring USD 40 million received from Diageo into the accounts of his children.
Vijay Mallya had filed review to consider an affidavit claiming this amount was not part of his assets.(REUTERS)
Vijay Mallya had filed review to consider an affidavit claiming this amount was not part of his assets.(REUTERS)
Updated on Aug 31, 2020 01:03 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | Byhindustantimes.com| Edited by Susmita Pakrasi

No communication from Pakistan on Kulbhushan Jadhav case, says India

The Islamabad high court on Monday had directed the government to inform India to appoint a lawyer for Kulbhushan Jadhav in order to file a review petition against his conviction. He is facing a death sentence for alleged spying.
MEA spokesperson Anurag Srivastava said there has been no response from Pakistan on the Kulbhushan jadhav case.(ANI)
MEA spokesperson Anurag Srivastava said there has been no response from Pakistan on the Kulbhushan jadhav case.(ANI)
Updated on Aug 06, 2020 07:30 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New delhi | Byhindustan times.com| Editedby Sabir Hussain

SC dismisses review petitions challenging 2018 verdict on adultery

In September 2018, the Supreme Court had scrapped the 19th century law on adultery calling it arbitrary and offensive to a woman’s dignity.
The Supreme Court said there is no need to revisit its ruling on adultery.(HT PHOTO)
The Supreme Court said there is no need to revisit its ruling on adultery.(HT PHOTO)
Published on Jun 24, 2020 07:18 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByAbraham Thomas

Sunni Waqf Board to build mosque, hospital on five-acre land allotted by UP govt

Monday’s announcement came after the SCWB held a meeting of its members to discuss the pending issues related to compliance with the SC order.
Based on the SC verdict, the Centre had asked the Uttar Pradesh government to allot five acres of land to the SCWB. The UP cabinet after its meeting on February 5 made the allotment in Dhannipur village in Sohawal tehsil of Ayodhya district. (Image used for representation).(REUTERS PHOTO.)
Based on the SC verdict, the Centre had asked the Uttar Pradesh government to allot five acres of land to the SCWB. The UP cabinet after its meeting on February 5 made the allotment in Dhannipur village in Sohawal tehsil of Ayodhya district. (Image used for representation).(REUTERS PHOTO.)
Updated on Feb 24, 2020 05:51 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, Lucknow | ByHT Correspondent

Can refer legal questions to larger bench: Supreme Court in Sabarimala case

The court had observed that the practices entailing restriction on entry of women in places of worship was not limited to the Sabarimala case, but also arose in respect of three other cases.
On November 14, 2019, a five-judge bench that heard the Sabarimala review petitions framed seven questions to be answered by a larger bench, resulting in the constitution of a nine-judge bench.(Reuters Photo)
On November 14, 2019, a five-judge bench that heard the Sabarimala review petitions framed seven questions to be answered by a larger bench, resulting in the constitution of a nine-judge bench.(Reuters Photo)
Updated on Feb 10, 2020 06:27 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByMurali Krishnan

‘Don’t indulge in politics over Delhi gang rape case’: Kejriwal tells Smriti Irani

Irani had earlier on Friday said that it was because of the Aam Aadmi Party government in the Capital that the convicts on death row could not be hanged in a time-bound manner after their review petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court in July 2019.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said that he was upset at the politics being done on the Delhi gang rape issue.(PTI PHOTO.)
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said that he was upset at the politics being done on the Delhi gang rape issue.(PTI PHOTO.)
Updated on Aug 27, 2020 12:52 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

‘Option of filing curative petition still left’: Delhi gangrape convicts tell Tihar authorities

The Supreme Court had last week dismissed the review petition filed by one of the four convicts, Akshay Kumar Singh, after finding no merits in it.
A protest march against rising incidents of violence against women in Kolkata.(AP Photo)
A protest march against rising incidents of violence against women in Kolkata.(AP Photo)
Updated on Dec 24, 2019 04:23 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByRicha Banka

Trying to delay the inevitable, Centre to Supreme Court on Delhi gang-rape convict’s review petition

During the course of hearing, Akshay’s lawyer AP Singh had pleaded that his client should not be given death penalty.
File photo of a protest against rape cases in the country.(HT File Photo)
File photo of a protest against rape cases in the country.(HT File Photo)
Updated on Dec 18, 2019 12:47 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Review petition of 2012 Delhi gangrape convict among cases in Supreme Court today

Supporters hold placards demanding capital punishment for the all rape-murder convicts.(Sonu Mehta/HT Photo)
Supporters hold placards demanding capital punishment for the all rape-murder convicts.(Sonu Mehta/HT Photo)
Updated on Dec 18, 2019 09:42 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

10 key arguments in 18 Ayodhya review petitions before Supreme Court today

Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde heads the five-judge bench that comprises justices DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna as other members.
Five judges of the Supreme Court will hear the review petitions challenging the top court’s November 9 judgment in the Ayodhya title at 1.40 pm on Thursday.(AP Photo)
Five judges of the Supreme Court will hear the review petitions challenging the top court’s November 9 judgment in the Ayodhya title at 1.40 pm on Thursday.(AP Photo)
Updated on Dec 12, 2019 04:56 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByMurali Krishnan

Sacked from Ayodhya case, says Dhavan

Dhavan appeared for the Muslim parties, including the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind (JuH) that filed the first review petition on Monday, in the title dispute case. He said he was removed by JuH on the same day it filed the review plea challenging the apex court’s verdict.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan said on Tuesday that he had been sacked by a prominent Muslim body that he represented before the Supreme Court in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case(Rajeev Dhavan/Facebook)
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan said on Tuesday that he had been sacked by a prominent Muslim body that he represented before the Supreme Court in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case(Rajeev Dhavan/Facebook)
Updated on Dec 04, 2019 12:46 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByMurali Krishnan, New Delhi

Review Ayodhya verdict plea reaches Supreme Court, challenges on 14 points

This is the first review petition filed by a Muslim party against the verdict that had ordered a 5-acre plot be given to the Sunni Board by the government because the community had been wronged more than once.
A general view of Ayodhya.(REUTERS)
A general view of Ayodhya.(REUTERS)
Updated on Dec 02, 2019 04:38 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByAshok Bagriya

Muslim body split over challenging SC’s Ayodhya verdict

The Jamiat Ulama-i- Hind (JUH), one of the largest Islamic religious organisations in India, had joined the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) last Sunday in opposing the unanimous SC decision favouring the construction of a Ram temple at the 2.77 acre site in Uttar Pradesh’s Ayodhya town.
A top Muslim body appeared to be divided on Thursday over filing a review petition challenging the Supreme Court’s verdict, delivered earlier this month, in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit.(HT Photo)
A top Muslim body appeared to be divided on Thursday over filing a review petition challenging the Supreme Court’s verdict, delivered earlier this month, in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit.(HT Photo)
Updated on Nov 22, 2019 06:16 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, LUCKNOW/BAREILLY | ByM Tariq Khan

All India Muslim Personal Law Board decides to file review petition against Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict

All India Muslim Personal Law Board decides to file review petition against Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict
All India Muslim Personal Law Board decides to file review petition against Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict(REUTERS)
All India Muslim Personal Law Board decides to file review petition against Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict(REUTERS)
Updated on Jul 25, 2020 10:32 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

God heard our prayers, says chief priest after Supreme Court’s Sabarimala ruling

The five-member bench, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, was hearing 65 petitions seeking review of its September 2018 order that triggered widespread protests in the state after menstruating women were allowed to enter the shrine of Lord Ayyappa.
A view of pilgrims at the Sabarimala Sannidhanam or the main temple complex(Vivek R Nair / HT photo)
A view of pilgrims at the Sabarimala Sannidhanam or the main temple complex(Vivek R Nair / HT photo)
Updated on Nov 14, 2019 11:50 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, Thiruvananthapuram | ByHT Correspondent

Watch | Ayodhya done, Sabarimala verdict next: What’s at stake?

Now all eyes are on whether the top court will use the Ayodhya template in its verdict on the Sabarimala row.
Updated on Jul 22, 2020 03:09 AM IST
Copy Link
ByHindustan Times

Supreme Court dismisses review plea of Coimbatore rape-murder convict

In a majority judgment of 2:1, a bench headed by Justice R F Nariman dismissed the plea filed by the convict Manoharan and said there are no grounds to review the verdict.
The top court had last month stayed the execution of convict Manoharan and said it would hear arguments on his plea seeking review of its August 1 verdict which had confirmed his death penalty.(Amal KS/HT PHOTO)
The top court had last month stayed the execution of convict Manoharan and said it would hear arguments on his plea seeking review of its August 1 verdict which had confirmed his death penalty.(Amal KS/HT PHOTO)
Published on Nov 07, 2019 12:18 PM IST
Copy Link
New Delhi | ByPress Trust of India

Supreme Court refers Centre’s plea on SC/ST act to larger bench

The apex court had last year banned automatic arrests and registration of cases under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, triggering protests in many parts of the country against dilution of the law that was designed to protect marginalised communities from abuse and discrimination.
The Supreme Court on Friday referred its March 2018 verdict banning automatic arrests in cases involving crimes against underprivileged classes to a three-judge bench.(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)
The Supreme Court on Friday referred its March 2018 verdict banning automatic arrests in cases involving crimes against underprivileged classes to a three-judge bench.(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)
Updated on Sep 13, 2019 11:51 PM IST
Copy Link
New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Supreme Court’s 2018 verdict diluting Dalit atrocity law to be reviewed by 3-judge bench

The top court had last year banned automatic arrests and registration of cases under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, triggering protests in parts of the country.
The Centre first filed a review petition in the Supreme Court but the court didn’t immediately stay its verdict.(HT file photo)
The Centre first filed a review petition in the Supreme Court but the court didn’t immediately stay its verdict.(HT file photo)
Updated on Sep 13, 2019 05:18 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByAshok Bagriya

On plea to execute December 16 rapists, court seeks report from jail admin

Additional sessions judge Pawan Kumar Jain has also asked the special public prosecutor for state Rajiv Mohan and amicus curiae Vrinda Grover to apprise the court about the procedure provided in Code for Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for ordering execution after the Supreme Court confirmed the death sentence.
The court was of the view that unless and until all remedies available in law are not exhausted by the convicts, the date for execution of death sentence can’t be fixed.(HT Photo)
The court was of the view that unless and until all remedies available in law are not exhausted by the convicts, the date for execution of death sentence can’t be fixed.(HT Photo)
Updated on Jun 05, 2019 06:21 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Supreme Court reserves Rafale verdict, government stresses no corruption

In its final arguments, the government on Friday opposed reopening of the Rafale case and asked the Supreme Court to refrain from examining the deal as nowhere in the world do courts scrutinize agreements related to defence purchases.
A Supreme Court bench hearing the Rafale case reserved its judgement on Friday, and with the court going into recess from Monday, a judgement can be expected only after July 3 when the court reopens.(Biplov Bhuyan/HT PHOTO)
A Supreme Court bench hearing the Rafale case reserved its judgement on Friday, and with the court going into recess from Monday, a judgement can be expected only after July 3 when the court reopens.(Biplov Bhuyan/HT PHOTO)
Published on May 10, 2019 11:51 PM IST
Copy Link
New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Review plea by 21 parties to verify more VVPAT votes rejected by Supreme Court in 60 secs

Citing issues with electronic voting machines (EVM) in the first few phases of polling for the Lok Sabha election, 21 opposition parties had filed a review petition in the Supreme Court demanding verification of 50% EVMs using voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) slips.
SC dismisses review petition filed by 21 opposition parties seeking verification of 50% EVMs, VVPATs.(AFP File Photo)
SC dismisses review petition filed by 21 opposition parties seeking verification of 50% EVMs, VVPATs.(AFP File Photo)
Updated on May 07, 2019 11:32 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Lok Sabha elections 2019: Supreme Court to hear review plea by Oppn on VVPAT matching

The 21 opposition leaders have urged the top court to reconsider its April 8 directive to the Election Commission of India to increase random matching of VVPAT slips with EVMs from one to five polling booths per assembly segment in every Lok Sabha constituency.
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appeared for the petitioners and asked for an urgent hearing of the review plea, which a bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi agreed to take up next week.
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appeared for the petitioners and asked for an urgent hearing of the review plea, which a bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi agreed to take up next week.
Updated on May 04, 2019 12:48 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

21 parties file review petition in SC for 50% VVPAT verification

The Election Commission of India (EC) has consistently maintained that the glitches experienced in the first three phases of the seven-phase election are within acceptable limits in terms of number of defects.
21 opposition parties have moved the Supreme Court and have sought verification of 50% EVMs using VVPAT.(AFP File Photo)
21 opposition parties have moved the Supreme Court and have sought verification of 50% EVMs using VVPAT.(AFP File Photo)
Updated on May 05, 2020 05:03 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Lok Sabha elections 2019: Rahul clarifies SC comments but keeps up Rafale attack on Modi

His reaction to the court order “unfortunately got juxtaposed and mingled with the political slogan – Chowkidar Chor Hai,” Gandhi stated in the affidavit filed before the court.
Gandhi filed an affidavit in response to a contempt petition filed against him by Bharatiya Janata Party MP Meenakshi Lekhi.(HT Photo)
Gandhi filed an affidavit in response to a contempt petition filed against him by Bharatiya Janata Party MP Meenakshi Lekhi.(HT Photo)
Updated on May 02, 2020 09:43 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Surrender in Ranchi district court, Supreme Court tells former minister

The decision followed the hearing of a review petition filed by Sao in which he had pleaded that his arrest be deferred till the time his case was transferred to the Ranchi district court from Hazaribag.
Surrender in Ranchi district court, Supreme Court tells former minister(Amal KS/HT PHOTO)
Surrender in Ranchi district court, Supreme Court tells former minister(Amal KS/HT PHOTO)
Published on Apr 12, 2019 11:51 PM IST
Copy Link
Ranchi | ByHT Correspondent

Rafale petitioners want to present selective picture of deal: Defence Ministry

The apex court on Wednesday rejected the government’s contention that sensitive documents accessed by the media on the Rafale deal cannot be evidence and said it will examine the papers while reviewing its order of December 14 last year when a clean chit was given to the deal.
The top court said review petitions against its earlier verdict dismissing all petitions against procurement of Rafale jets will be decided on merit.(PTI PHOTO)
The top court said review petitions against its earlier verdict dismissing all petitions against procurement of Rafale jets will be decided on merit.(PTI PHOTO)
Updated on Apr 10, 2019 05:39 PM IST
Copy Link
Press Trust of India, New Delhi | ByPress Trust of India
SHARE
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
Story Saved
×
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Thursday, December 09, 2021