‘Divyang is an insult, not respect to persons with disability’
Enraged by the use of the term ‘divyang’ by Union minister Thawar Chand Gehlot to address persons with disability, an advisor in Jawaharlal Nehru University GN Karna said the term “is an insult to the community.”
Enraged by the use of the term ‘divyang’ by Union minister Thawar Chand Gehlot to address persons with disability, an advisor in Jawaharlal Nehru University GN Karna said the term “is an insult to the community.”

“Union minister of social justice and empowerment Thawar Chand Gehlot is making fun of India by publicising the word ‘Divyang’ in place of ‘Viklang’. The word Divyang in itself is an insult. Insensibility and inadequate knowledge of the minister hurts us,” said Karna, who is also disabled.
Addressing a public meeting in Varanasi in January, Gehlot announced that identity cards will be made available to all people with disability, whom he addressed as ‘divyangs’.
An expert on disability and ex-chairman of a working group of the 11th Five Year Plan on disability, Karna said, “Since the word was coined by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on his radio show ‘Mann ki Baat’, I will write a letter to PM Modi to refrain from using this word.”
“Divyang means a person having extraordinary power. It is laughable and sarcastic to call us ‘divyang’. We should use only one word – persons with disability- which is acceptable worldwide,” he said.
Emphasising on the discrimination and stigma associated with disability, Karna said, “We don’t want special treatment. We want only equal treatment.”
Karna also objected to the use of the word ‘Nishakt’ that has been used in the translation of The Right of Person with Disabilities Bill.
“The word Nishakt is also objectionable as even though I can’t stand on my feet, it doesn’t mean, I can’t do anything,” said Karna.
ABOUT THE AUTHORShruti TomarI have spent over a decade chronicling Madhya Pradesh’s political and social landscape, covering politics, investigative journalism, crime, human interest, and government policy, blending sharp insight with ground‑level depth. I have closely tracked three assembly elections, three Lok Sabha elections, leadership transitions in MP while exposing governance lapses, tender irregularities, and flawed policy rollouts. My reports have revealed gaps in the Cheetah project, irregularities in medical education, rigging in recruitment exams, and loopholes in policy implementation. In crime reporting, I have moved beyond FIRs to map systemic patterns — from organised crime networks and gender‑based violence to custodial accountability — balancing urgency with sensitivity. My journalism is defined by a commitment to human interest. I have profiled the marginalised Bancchda community, documented atrocities against tribal groups, and highlighted efforts to preserve their culture through heritage liquor and revival of spiritual practices. I have reported on farmers struggling with failed MSP promises, giving voice to those often reduced to statistics in policy files. Passionate about field reporting, I have reported on rampant sand mining in Chambal and Narmada, pharmaceutical companies supplying medicines under altered names, the dire condition of schools and colleges, the plight of commercial sex workers, and skewed sex ratios in specific districts. Beyond deadlines, and as HT’s state correspondent and assistant editor in Madhya Pradesh, I engage with ministers, farmers, students, and activists, believing the best policy stories begin with a single human voice. A postgraduate in Journalism and Mass Communication, I also hold a diploma in sports journalism.Read More

E-Paper


