Sign in

Karat disagrees with Rice: PM was keen on N-deal

General secretary of the CPM and perhaps the most ardent critic of the India-US nuclear deal, Prakash Karat, said unlike Condoleezza Rice, he never got the sense that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was unsure of how he would sell the pact in New Delhi.

Updated on: Oct 30, 2011, 24:53:36 IST
Hindustan Times | By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

General secretary of the CPM and perhaps the most ardent critic of the India-US nuclear deal, Prakash Karat, said unlike Condoleezza Rice, he never got the sense that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was unsure of how he would sell the pact in New Delhi.

HT Image
HT Image

Instead, Karat maintained Manmohan Singh was "most keen" to get the nuclear deal done and thereby honour the commitment made to the US.

The CPM and three other Left parties had withdrawn the crucial support they had given to the UPA-1 government over the nuclear deal.

Karat was reacting to former US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice, who in her forthcoming book, says Singh was not sure how he could sell the nuclear deal back home.

Rice also explains how the then foreign minister Natwar Singh played an active role in convincing a reluctant Manmohan Singh for the July 18, 2005, India-US joint statement that envisaged the nuclear deal.

But Karat is not impressed. On whether he ever got the sense that Rice had about the Prime Minister being reluctant about the nuclear deal, Karat said, "He was most keen to get the deal done and fulfil the commitment made to the Americans."

Though it eventually gave UPA-1 time to gather support to survive, the UPA-Left committee on the nuclear deal, as the 15-member panel was formally called, held nine meetings. The panel had top leaders of the Left and Congress.

The CPM didn't go for withdrawal of support, and the government went to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for negotiating a safeguard agreement, a crucial step in the implementation of the deal.

The declared understanding was that the government would talk to the IAEA, and based on the discussions there, would come back to the UPA-Left committee, which would examine it. Only then the next steps would be taken.

This understanding was arrived in November 2007.

At the same time, the West Bengal unit of the CPM had raised reservations about the timing of an early withdrawal as well.

As the government moved ahead with finalising the safeguard pact, the Left withdrew support to the government in July 2008.

Later, Karat got flak from the party for delaying the withdrawal, which helped the government to survive as well as complete the deal.

  • Jayanth Jacob
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Jayanth Jacob

    Jayanth Jacob writes on foreign policy and politics for Hindustan Times.

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.