Made for $4 million; earned $4 billion: How world's most profitable film beat Avatar, Avengers; yet never had a sequel
This film from eight decades ago kept on increasing its box office gross courtesy of subsequent re-releases and inflation-adjusted earnings.
Which is the most profitable film ever? The answer depends on how exactly you crunch the numbers. Is it the film that earned the most money for its studio or producers, or the one that earned the most in comparison to its budget? Both approaches are correct depending on what you are looking for. But somewhere in between is a third way that looks at a film's earnings over the years and decades. On this parameter, an all-time classic from over eight decades ago sits at the top.

The world's most profitable film
Based on Margaret Mitchell's novel, the 1939 Victor Fleming film Gone With The Wind is regarded as one of the greatest and most influential films ever made. Set against the backdrop of the American Civil War and the Reconstruction era, the film starred Clark Gable, Vivien Leigh, Leslie Howard, and Olivia de Havilland. Made on a budget of $3.9 million, it was among the most expensive films produced at the time. But despite the high budget, it was a runaway hit, earning several times its budget with a final gross of $39 million. But that was not all. The film saw several subsequent re-releases, raking in an additional $165 million over the years.
In 2014, the Guinness Book of World Records estimated that its total inflation-adjusted box office gross was around $3.44 billion. Today, that would be close to $4 billion. This would make it an even bigger hit than Avatar ($2.9 billion) and Avengers: Endgame ($2.7 billion), the two highest-grossing films of all time.
Why was there never a sequel
Despite being an era-defining success, Gone With The Wind never had a sequel. The author Margaret Mitchell was flooded with requests for a sequel for the novel, but she said she left Scarlett and Rhett "to their ultimate fate". The author resisted pressure for a sequel till her death in 1948. In 1975, her brother, who had control of her estate, authorised a sequel that was to be jointly produced by MGM and Universal Studios. Anne Edwards wrote a screenplay that MGM did not like, and the deal collapsed.
In the end, a continuation of sorts was produced in 1994, but in the form of a television miniseries. Titled Scarlett, the series was based on the novel by Alexandra Ripley, itself a sequel to Mitchell's book.
ABOUT THE AUTHORAbhimanyu MathurAbhimanyu Mathur is Deputy Editor, Entertainment at Hindustan Times. With almost 15 years of experience in writing about everything from films and TV shows to cricket matches and elections, he inhales and exhales pop culture and news. Currently, he watches movies and TV shows and talks to celebrities for a living, while occasionally writing about them as well. A journalism graduate of Delhi College of Arts and Commerce, Delhi University, Abhimanyu began his career with Hindustan Times at the age of 20, swapping classrooms for newsrooms at an early age. He began his journey in the early days of digital journalism, later switching to the madness of print journalism. Work has led him to far off places like Japan and Jordan, as well as to the interiors of Haryana and the Indo-Pak border. He dabbled in city reporting in places like Meerut, Gurgaon, and Delhi, covered the Olympics and Cricket World Cups, before finding his calling in entertainment and lifestyle during the pandemic. A Rotten Tomatoes Certified Film Critic, he is equally at home covering stories on ground as he is interviewing celebrities and studios, and sometimes prefers to shepherd teams in delivering traffic through the day. Even as his role has evolved from reporter to supervisor over the years, his first love remains writing (and of late, talking on camera). With a good understanding of cinema and its trends, and a keen eye for detail, he continues to spark conversations around showbiz for readers around the world.Read More

E-Paper


