E-Paper
Govt, RBI must take bold decisions, not incremental measures: Amit Mitra
West Bengal’s finance minister Amit Mitra said that the Union government and the Reserve bank of India must come out of their ‘Lakshman Rekha’ and take bold decisions, not incremental measures.
West Bengal finance minister Amit Mitra is an economist by both training and practice. A Ph.D scholar from Duke University in the US, Mitra is an ardent advocate of developmental economics. In this difficult time of the coronavirus pandemic, in a telephonic interview with Hindustan Times, he says that the role of the Centre is to live up to the true spirit of cooperative federalism and take all possible measures to boost the sagging economy without worrying about breaching the laid-down fiscal deficit glide path. Edited excerpts:
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has slashed India’s economic growth to 1.9% in the current year when the global economy would contract by 3%. What do you suggest to boost the growth?
This is an unprecedented situation and the Central government should come up with a comprehensive plan to boost the economy, which is a must to check rising unemployment, poverty and hunger. The Centre must announce a package of 6% of GDP as suggested by the CM [Mamata Banerjee] to the PM [Narendra Modi]. This is around Rs 10 lakh crore.
The Union government and the Reserve bank of India must come out of their ‘Lakshman Rekha’ and take bold decisions, not incremental measures. There must be a big bang announcement. A substantial stimulus is a must, and also possible, because India has headroom to borrow. Compared to many developed countries, India’s debt-to-GDP ratio is less than 70%, while it is 106% for USA and 240% for Japan. Besides, international oil prices are subdued, which is in favour of a country like India that imports more than 80% of its crude oil requirements. Another source of headroom is India’s large foreign exchange reserves. The Centre must leverage these incidental advantages now and stop worrying about the fiscal deficit at a time when the question is of survival. The government must provide money in the hands of the poor, who are fighting to survive. About Rs 4 lakh crore could be transferred to the states which have the capacity to digitally transfer the requisite money into the bank accounts of the poor. In West Bengal, all disbursements are done digitially, no cheques or cash is used in our treasury. The poor must be provided free ration as we have done in West Bengal providing rice and wheat at zero price from ration shops.
What about the formal sector?
Industry is facing both demand and supply challenges as supply channels have broken down. The stimulus will help in creating demand and provide liquidity in the system. It can even be considered to provide what is internationally {done during such times} -- 80% salary of the works paid {for} by the corporate sector during the lockdown is borne by the government. This will allow the retention of the worker and this human capital can be quickly put on use when the Covid-19 pandemic is over.
The liquidly crunch is acute, particularly for the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). It calls for soft loans for a period of four years with a moratorium on repayments and interest for at least the first year. This will give them the breathing space. Similarly, other formal sectors need calibrated support. Sectors like aviation, hospitality, tourism, and non-essential retail have been almost crippled due to the lockdown.
What is your assessment of economic growth post Covid-19?
It is difficult to predict at this juncture when even developed countries are unable to give any precise answer when this [the pandemic] will end. If the pandemic ends by October and with adequate policy and fiscal stimulations, India could see at best 1% GDP growth. But if the pandemic continued for longer, it will have direct impact on GDP, which may even contract, posting negative growth.
Is Centre providing enough financial support to the states, particularly to West Bengal?
The Centre is not as responsive as it should have been in an ideal cooperative federalism and at a time when states are fighting a pandemic. Finance minister [Nirmala Sitharaman] has not replied to any of my letters, though I had one conversation with her. I have written eight letters, highlighting some genuine concerns of states and precarious financial positions they are suffering from. Of course, one or two suggestions have been accepted partially. An ideal cooperative federalism must encourage a culture of dialogue. States are the real implementers of policies and welfare programmes. They must be considered as part and parcel of a united India.
Are you referring to the controversy regarding the interministerial central teams (IMCTs) sent to West Bengal?
The Centre’s decision to send two interministerial central teams to West Bengal was done without consulting the state government. This is a breach of federalist protocol. The Centre’s move was not in the right spirit of cooperative federalism. We are also unable to understand why particular districts had been chosen. In terms of both -- number of [Covid-19] cases, and the rate of increase – Ahmedabad in Gujarat had a far larger numbers of cases and faster rate of increase. But it was not on the Centre’s radar.
