Sign in

Gujarat NGO withdraws defamation suit against BBC over Modi documentary

Justice on Trial, the NGO, sought 10,000 damages for the loss of reputation and goodwill that ‘India: The Modi Question’ caused

Updated on: Sep 7, 2026, 11:54:29 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

A Gujarat-based non-governmental organisation (NGO) has withdrawn a defamation suit it filed against the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) three years ago in the Delhi high court, accusing the broadcaster of defaming Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Indian judiciary by airing the documentary ‘India: The Modi Question’ in January 2023. It sought permission to file a fresh suit.

The government dismissed the documentary as “propaganda” and a reflection of the “colonial mindset”. (AFP)
The government dismissed the documentary as “propaganda” and a reflection of the “colonial mindset”. (AFP)

The documentary cited a previously unpublished United Kingdom foreign ministry report that questioned Modi’s actions during the 2002 riots when he was the Gujarat chief minister. The government dismissed it as “propaganda” and a reflection of the “colonial mindset”.

The lawyer representing Justice on Trial, the NGO, told a bench of Justice Tushar Rao Gedela on September 3 that he had instructions to withdraw the suit. He added that the notice issued in the matter related to an application seeking permission to sue as an indigent person, and not to the defamation suit itself. “He states that he is under instructions to withdraw the...suit with liberty to file fresh suit for the same cause of action,” the court said. The court dismissed the suit as withdrawn.

In its suit, the NGO sought 10,000 damages for the loss of reputation and goodwill caused to the Prime Minister, the Union and the Gujarat governments, and the people of India.

The suit said the governmental and judicial response to the 2002 riots was to ensure that the rule of law is restored, and all people involved, regardless of their status or position, bear the consequences. It called the documentary defamatory because it did not present facts objectively.

The BBC maintained the documentary was rigorously researched in line with its highest editorial standards, even as the government directed video-sharing service YouTube to take down its copies and Twitter (now X) to remove related posts. The government said the documentary peddled a “discredited narrative” and highlighted that the Supreme Court cleared Modi of any wrongdoing.

In February 2023, the Supreme Court dismissed as “completely misconceived” a public interest litigation demanding a ban on the BBC in India amid the controversy over the documentary. The same month, the income tax department carried out what it described as a “survey” of the BBC offices in Delhi and Mumbai, sparking a political row. Opposition parties criticised the action and linked it to the BBC’s airing of a two-part documentary.

  • Utkarsh Anand
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Utkarsh Anand

    Utkarsh Anand is the National Legal Editor at Hindustan Times, where he leads the newspaper's coverage of the Supreme Court, constitutional law, the judiciary and the Union law ministry. He joined Hindustan Times in 2020 after stints at Press Trust of India (PTI), The Indian Express and CNN-News18, and has over two decades of experience reporting on law, governance and public policy. His work has focussed on some of India's most consequential constitutional and legal developments, including the Supreme Court's judgments on Article 370, marriage equality, decriminalisation of homosexuality, the Babri Masjid dispute, electoral reforms and judicial appointments. He specialises in making complex legal proceedings and judgments accessible to readers while examining their wider social and political impact. Beyond daily reportage, Utkarsh has led investigative projects and enterprise reporting that have shaped public debate and prompted institutional responses. His work has received several journalism awards, including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award. As National Legal Editor, he has also played a key role in expanding Hindustan Times' legal journalism footprint, mentoring reporters and strengthening coverage across platforms. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow, Utkarsh regularly writes analyses on the judiciary and constitutional issues, and his reporting is widely followed by lawyers, judges, policymakers, academics and readers seeking clarity on India's evolving legal landscape.Read More

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather major national developments and Karnataka Bandh LIVE.