Original owner liable to pay accident victim: Supreme Court | Latest News India - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

Original owner liable to pay accident victim: Supreme Court

Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Dec 20, 2018 10:57 PM IST

If vehicle ownership is not updated in the official records after its sale, the original owner will have to cough up damages if the vehicle is involved in a crash even though the new owner is responsible.

Take note, vehicle owners: after you sell your car, make sure the change in ownership is updated in the official records of the Regional Transport Authority (RTA). Otherwise, according to a recent Supreme Court order, you will have to cough up damages if the vehicle is involved in a crash even though the new owner is responsible.

Transfer of ownership of a vehicle does not absolve the original owner of the liability to pay compensation for an accident, unless the change is effected in the RTA files, the Supreme Court has ruled.(Ravi Kumar/HT PHOTO)
Transfer of ownership of a vehicle does not absolve the original owner of the liability to pay compensation for an accident, unless the change is effected in the RTA files, the Supreme Court has ruled.(Ravi Kumar/HT PHOTO)

The judgment, delivered last week by a bench led by justice UU Lalit, says transfer of ownership of a vehicle does not absolve the original owner of the liability to pay compensation for an accident, unless the change is effected in the RTA files.

With its verdict, the top court dismissed an appeal by Prakash Chand Daga questioning a Punjab and Haryana high court judgment of April 5, 2018, that upheld the Chandigarh Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal’s 2011 order holding him liable to pay part of the compensation amount of 12.47 lakh awarded to the victim of a road accident in which the appellant’s car was involved. The money was to be paid jointly by him and Saveta Sharma, who purchased his vehicle.

“Even though in law there would be a transfer of ownership of the vehicle, that by itself would not absolve the party in whose name the vehicle stands in RTO records from liability to a third person,” the bench, also comprising justice DY Chandrachud said.

The bench also cleared an interest of 7.5%, to be paid from the date of filing the suit till final realisation, on the total compensation amount. Daga had sold his Santro car to Sharma on September 11, 2009. Although he received the sale amount, in the RTA records he continued to be the original owner. Daga’s lawyer submitted that the accident had occurred within 30 days of the transfer and the statutory period prescribed under law to approach the authority for paper work had not expired by then. Therefore, such a liability could not be placed on his client.

But the bench rejected the contention, saying the transfer of the vehicle ought to be registered within 30 days of sale. However, the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, obliges the transferor to report the sale to the authority, where the vehicle was originally registered, within 14 days.

The transferee, too, was bound to report purchase to RTO within whose jurisdiction he/she has residence or place of business where the car would be parked. Both transferor and transferee are required to report the transfer to the authority, the court said.

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

See more

Get Current Updates on India News, Budget 2024, Weather Today along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Sunday, July 14, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On