New Delhi -°C
Today in New Delhi, India

Aug 16, 2019-Friday
-°C

Humidity
-

Wind
-

Select city

Metro cities - Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata

Other cities - Noida, Gurgaon, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Bhopal , Chandigarh , Dehradun, Indore, Jaipur, Lucknow, Patna, Ranchi

Friday, Aug 16, 2019

Ram temple mentioned in William Foster’s book: Lawyer in Ayodhya hearing

Hindu party advocate in Ayodhya land dispute case C S Vaidyanathan said that early travellers to India like William Finch and William Hawkins made references in their writings about Ayodhya.

india Updated: Aug 14, 2019 15:12 IST
Asian News International
Asian News International
New Delhi
The Supreme Court said one of the earliest European geographers who write about India Joseph Tiefenthaler seems to suggest that Ram temple was demolished by Aurangzeb.
The Supreme Court said one of the earliest European geographers who write about India Joseph Tiefenthaler seems to suggest that Ram temple was demolished by Aurangzeb.(HT File Photo)
         

Hindu party advocate in Ayodhya land dispute case, C S Vaidyanathan, on Wednesday said that English writer William Foster published a book “Early Travels in India” which describes Ayodhya and building of Ram temple.

“During the reign of Akbar and Jahangir, there were early travellers to India like William Finch, William Hawkins who made references in their writing about Ayodhya. William Foster published the book “Early Travels in India” which contains accounts of seven English travellers to India. The books describe Ayodhya and building of Ram temple,” Vaidyanathan said during the hearing in the apex court.

The Supreme Court said one of the earliest European geographers who write about India Joseph Tiefenthaler seems to suggest that Ram temple was demolished by Aurangzeb.

On this, Vaidyanath said Tiefenthaler refers to two accounts one of demolition by Aurangzeb and second by Babur, but it is clear it was demolished before 1786.

“Who demolished the temple wouldn’t matter for us as it proves that the temple existed. What is important about the document is that it identifies the Janmasthan and that a mosque was put up at the site of the Ram temple,” he said.

On Court’s question when was the temple called Babri Masjid came into existence, Vaidyanathan said: “In the 19th century it was called Babri Masjid. Before that, there was nothing to prove or show it was called Babri Masjid. Before 1786 there is no document to show this was known as Babri Masjid.”

“It was Babur who ordered his military commander to build the mosque. There is a reference in Baburnama about Babur’s visit to Ayodhya,” the advocate said on being asked what is the evidence that Babur gave the order to build the mosque? Reacting to Vaidyanathan’s reply in reference to Baburnama, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan for Muslim side objected, stating “two pages of Baburnama referring to the episode are missing”.

Later, Vaidyanathan said: “Faith of the people is Lord Rama. These works are being relied upon by me not to establish historical facts but to establish the faith and belief of people and religious significance, the divine significance of the place holds to people and in this context, these works by Europeans are being relied upon.”

On August 8, a five-judge bench headed by CJI and including Justices D Y Chandrachud, S A Bobde, Ashok Bhushan and S A Abdul Nazeer, had said that it will hear the Ayodhya title dispute case five days in the week -- from Monday to Friday. The court is hearing appeals against the September 30, 2010 verdict of the Allahabad High Court in the case.

(The story has been published from a wire feed without any modifications to the text, only the headline has been changed)

First Published: Aug 14, 2019 15:12 IST

more from india