Sign in

Supreme Court rejects BJP MP Manoj Tiwari’s plea for quashing defamation case

A bench of justices SA Nazeer and V Ramasubramanian allowed a similar plea by BJP lawmaker Vijender Gupta, quashing the defamation case against him

Published on: Oct 17, 2022, 11:53:28 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of Parliament Manoj Tiwari’s challenge to the summons issued to him in a criminal defamation case filed by Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia.

The Supreme Court. (PTI)
The Supreme Court. (PTI)

A bench of justices SA Nazeer and V Ramasubramanian allowed a similar plea by BJP lawmaker Vijender Gupta, quashing the defamation case against him.

The BJP leaders challenged a trial court’s November 28, 2019, order summoning them and others as accused in the criminal defamation case.

Apart from Tiwari and Gupta, Sisodia filed the complaint against BJP leaders Hans Raj Hans Pravesh Verma, Manjinder Singh Sirsa, and Harish Khurana. All of them were issued the summons by the trial court in 2019.

The defamation complaint was filed by Sisodia for their remarks at a press conference accusing him of having misappropriated public money worth 2,000 crore in the name of constructing classrooms in Delhi government schools.

They were summoned by the Delhi court on November 28, 2019, to face trial in the defamation proceedings punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

In December 2020, the Delhi high court refused to entertain the petitions by the BJP leaders for staying the summoning order. The high court said that “there exists sufficient ground to proceed” against the BJP leaders.

Tiwari and Gupta moved the Supreme Court to seek setting aside of the trial court order, arguing what they said was not defamatory. They added the summoning order of the trial court was based on legally inadmissible evidence so it was illegal and contended that a prior sanction was required before prosecuting them.

  • Utkarsh Anand
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Utkarsh Anand

    Utkarsh Anand is the National Legal Editor at Hindustan Times, where he leads the newspaper's coverage of the Supreme Court, constitutional law, the judiciary and the Union law ministry. He joined Hindustan Times in 2020 after stints at Press Trust of India (PTI), The Indian Express and CNN-News18, and has over two decades of experience reporting on law, governance and public policy. His work has focussed on some of India's most consequential constitutional and legal developments, including the Supreme Court's judgments on Article 370, marriage equality, decriminalisation of homosexuality, the Babri Masjid dispute, electoral reforms and judicial appointments. He specialises in making complex legal proceedings and judgments accessible to readers while examining their wider social and political impact. Beyond daily reportage, Utkarsh has led investigative projects and enterprise reporting that have shaped public debate and prompted institutional responses. His work has received several journalism awards, including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award. As National Legal Editor, he has also played a key role in expanding Hindustan Times' legal journalism footprint, mentoring reporters and strengthening coverage across platforms. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow, Utkarsh regularly writes analyses on the judiciary and constitutional issues, and his reporting is widely followed by lawyers, judges, policymakers, academics and readers seeking clarity on India's evolving legal landscape.Read More