‘They want to control everything as if they are going to rule for 100 years’

Updated on Nov 16, 2021 03:04 PM IST

Kharge says the move to extend the period of CBI and ED chiefs for five years means that the government wants their choice of people for a longer time so that they can harass the common people, the opposition parties, NGOs, and journalists

Kharge said the Congress will also ask other opposition parties to stay united on this because the Centre was “killing” the democracy and they were “not” following the Constitutional rules and procedures. (ANI Photo)
Kharge said the Congress will also ask other opposition parties to stay united on this because the Centre was “killing” the democracy and they were “not” following the Constitutional rules and procedures. (ANI Photo)

Opposition parties have opposed the two ordinances that empower the Centre to post the chiefs of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for up to five years. Mallikarjun Kharge, the Opposition leader in Rajya Sabha, spoke to Sunetra Choudhury about the ordinances. Edited excerpts:

What is objectionable about the ordinances?

Firstly, why are they issuing these ordinances now? Secondly, why is it necessary to extend the period (tenures) from two years to five years? Why is it so urgent? Is it in the interest of the economy in the country? Is the law and order of the country going to collapse? Or, any war is going there? Why? If they could have waited, they would have taken the route of the Parliament and could have put forth a bill that could have been thoroughly discussed. It would have been better to go as per our parliamentary rules and procedure. They want to show that they can do anything because they have the majority. They are already using CBI, ED, and other agencies.

The government has already taken ED under the home ministry whereas previously it was under the finance ministry. Even the Co-operation department was taken away from Agriculture. Now, you are extending the period of CBI and ED chiefs for five years. This means that they want their choice of people for a longer time so that they can harass the common people, the opposition parties, NGOs, and journalists and do what they’re doing with Pegasus and other agencies to get the information.

We have objected to this since we are a democratic country. In the past, no other Prime Minister has hurried through issuing ordinances. So far, hundreds of Ordinances have been issued and now two more Ordinances. They are not going through democratic procedures. They are killing democracy and they are destroying the constitution. Ultimately, they want to become dictators and they are doing this through autocratic ways.

Did the government do this to extend the term of ED director Sanjay Kumar Mishra?

I am not talking about one individual. If the government extends the tenure to five years, naturally their choice of people will get an extension. But what is the necessity for extending the tenure? Is it in the interest of the country? Is it in the interest of law and order?

They point out the FBI director has a 10-year tenure and that the extension in the tenure will help the CBI director to oversee a case from investigation to conviction...

Now, over 70 years after independence, suddenly they find a fault in the agencies. I do not agree with this because they want their choice of people who have longevity.Also Read: When CBI recommended 5-year tenure for its chief but govt rejected it

How will the opposition protest?

We have to raise it in the Parliament and we will ask them to review it. We will also ask other opposition parties to stay united on this because the Centre is killing the democracy and they are not following the Constitutional rules and procedures. For this reason, we must be united because it is not a question of one party. It is for the survival of democracy. Also, for the institutions that are independently used to probe, nobody is to influence them. But now, day by day these independent institutions are deteriorating and are being misused. They are used to harass people including political opponents. Therefore, it is bad. People who are not favourable to them, they twist their arms.

Have not governments always wanted to control the CBI and other agencies? It was during the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) rule that the CBI was called a “caged parrot”...

That is wrong. The UPA did not behave like that. You people are saying that ED was taken from Finance department to Home department earlier and Cooperation department was taken to Home department. Can you show such instances? Simply saying that you have done like that so we are also doing like that. You are changing the departments.They want to control everything as if they are going to rule for 100 years. It means that you do not believe in democracy. You want to destroy democracy.

Get Latest India Newsalong with Latest Newsand Top Headlinesfrom India and around the world.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
  • ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Sunetra Choudhury is the National Political Editor of the Hindustan Times. With over two decades of experience in print and television, she has authored Black Warrant (Roli,2019), Behind Bars: Prison Tales of India’s Most Famous (Roli,2017) and Braking News (Hachette, 2010). Sunetra is the recipient of the Red Ink award in journalism in 2016 and Mary Morgan Hewett award in 2018.

SHARE
Story Saved
×
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
My Offers
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Monday, December 05, 2022
Start 15 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Register Free and get Exciting Deals