Top court order on Rafale deal review petitions today
The Supreme Court will rule on Thursday on a batch of petitions seeking a review of its December 2018 verdict that dismissed pleas seeking a court-monitored probe of alleged irregularities in the ₹59,000 crore Rafale fighter jet deal with French planemaker Dassault Aviation.
A bench led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, which also comprises justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph, reserved its verdict on the review petitions on May 10. The petitions have sought a re-examination of the December 2018 verdict, which found that due process had been followed in the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter jets.
Former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie, and lawyer Prashant Bhushan were among those who had filed the review pleas.
In its final arguments on May 10, the government opposed the reopening of the Rafale case while asking the Supreme Court to refrain from examining the deal. The government argued that nowhere in the world do courts scrutinise agreements related to defence purchases.
Sinha, Shourie, and Bhushan have also pressed for perjury proceedings against the Centre for allegedly suppressing information. They claimed that the government misled the court ahead of its December 2018 verdict.
The petitioners accused the government of deliberately concealing crucial notings related to the deal. They maintained that this included a dissent note of three members of the Indian negotiating team, alleging that it vitiates the December 2018 verdict and necessitates a criminal inquiry into the matter.
In his arguments on May 10, attorney general (AG) KK Venugopal said that a review is impermissible in such a sensitive case and cautioned the court that a defence deal was not subject to judicial review. Sinha, Shourie, and Bhushan have contended that the CBI failed to act on their complaint over the deal and violated the top court’s judgement on the filing of complaints.
Venugopal told the court on May 10 that no prima facie case had been made out in the Rafale case when justice Joseph put forth the petitioners’ query to the AG as to why no action was taken as per an earlier SC verdict that makes it obligatory for an investigative agency to register a criminal case if a complaint is filed.
Justice Joseph questioned Venugopal about the absence of a transfer of technology element in the Rafale deal, unlike previous deals.
As per petitioners, an earlier Rafale deal with Dassault Aviation was for 126 aircraft, of which 18 were to come in a flyaway condition while state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd was to build the remaining through transfer of technology.
Enter your email to get our daily newsletter in your inbox
- On October 29 last year, the top court had stayed a direction passed on October 20 by the Delhi High Court directing 2,318 undertrial prisoners to surrender in a phased manner.
- Deputy leader of the Congress in the Rajya Sabha, Anand Sharma, accused the party’s Bengal president and Lok Sabha member Adhir Ranjan Chowdury of diluting the party’s core ideology and the secularism by allying with Abbasuddin Siddiqui’s Indian Secular Front (ISF).
- This will be the first of the many public meetings Adityanath is scheduled to address in Bengal where the BJP is looking to unseat the led TMC.
- "Toll collection through electronic tolling has reached 93 per cent during the last fortnight after the FASTag was made mandatory," Gadkari said.
- The senior citizen said he would return on Tuesday with his wife on Tuesday o she could be administered her vaccine.
- The AAP has already announced it would contest the 2022 Uttar Pradesh assembly.