Sign in

Madhya Pradesh govt, Centre differ on acid attack statistics

There is a yawning chasm of difference between the number of acid attack victims quoted by the Union government in Parliament and the figures registered by the State Crime Record Bureau (SCRB) in Madhya Pradesh.

Updated on: Apr 29, 2015, 16:24:07 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Bhopal
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

There is a yawning chasm of difference between the number of acid attack victims quoted by the Union government in Parliament and the figures registered by the State Crime Record Bureau (SCRB) in Madhya Pradesh.

Article image

Going by the data provided by the SCRB and the state’s home department, they seem to have no inkling of as many as 39 acid attack cases that occurred right under their noses.

On April 21, Union minister of state for home Haribhai Chaudhary had stated that Madhya Pradesh – with as many as 53 instances – recorded the second-highest number of acid attack cases in 2014 (Uttar Pradesh was the most notorious with 186 cases).

He also informed the house that 46 persons had been arrested in the state for their alleged involvement in these cases.

Surprisingly, the SCRB – which is the sole recording agency of criminal cases in the state – holds a shockingly different contention. It claims that just 14 acid attack cases were registered in the state during that period.

SCRB additional director general RK Garg said, “Our staff collected this data from all the districts of Madhya Pradesh, and if only 14 cases of acid attacks were found to be registered, our figures must be right. We have no idea about the figures submitted in the Lok Sabha.”

Another SCRB officer, who wished to remain anonymous, also nodded in agreement. “We don’t know how the home ministry arrived at this figure. Probably it was sent to them by the crime against women division,” he said.

However, crime against women DSP Kiran Lata Kirketta denied doing anything of the kind. Even the state home department seemed unaware of how the Union home ministry had come to acquire the disputed ‘data’.

Commenting on the matter, principal secretary BP Singh said, “Data related to criminal cases is collected by the SCRB. And I don’t remember any such data being released by the home department.”

However, he did not want to make a big deal of it. “It’s not like this is happening for the first time,” said Singh. “Discrepancies in data are common.”

Ashish Shukla, an activist with Stop Acid Attack, found such nonchalance disconcerting.

“While it’s good that acid attacks have now found a separate head in crime records, the authorities don’t report the numbers correctly.”

Off by 39

On April 21, Union MoS Haribhai Chaudhary stated Madhya Pradesh – with as many as 53 instances – recorded the second-highest number of acid attack cases in 2014

The SCRB – which is the sole recording agency of criminal cases in the state –claims that just 14 acid attack cases were registered in the state during that period

An SCRB officer said it was probably the crimes against women department that sent the numbers to Union home ministry

But crime against women DSP Kiran Lata Kirketta denied doing anything of the kind

  • Shruti Tomar
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Shruti Tomar

    I have spent over a decade chronicling Madhya Pradesh’s political and social landscape, covering politics, investigative journalism, crime, human interest, and government policy, blending sharp insight with ground‑level depth. I have closely tracked three assembly elections, three Lok Sabha elections, leadership transitions in MP while exposing governance lapses, tender irregularities, and flawed policy rollouts. My reports have revealed gaps in the Cheetah project, irregularities in medical education, rigging in recruitment exams, and loopholes in policy implementation. In crime reporting, I have moved beyond FIRs to map systemic patterns — from organised crime networks and gender‑based violence to custodial accountability — balancing urgency with sensitivity. My journalism is defined by a commitment to human interest. I have profiled the marginalised Bancchda community, documented atrocities against tribal groups, and highlighted efforts to preserve their culture through heritage liquor and revival of spiritual practices. I have reported on farmers struggling with failed MSP promises, giving voice to those often reduced to statistics in policy files. Passionate about field reporting, I have reported on rampant sand mining in Chambal and Narmada, pharmaceutical companies supplying medicines under altered names, the dire condition of schools and colleges, the plight of commercial sex workers, and skewed sex ratios in specific districts. Beyond deadlines, and as HT’s state correspondent and assistant editor in Madhya Pradesh, I engage with ministers, farmers, students, and activists, believing the best policy stories begin with a single human voice. A postgraduate in Journalism and Mass Communication, I also hold a diploma in sports journalism.Read More