No decision on post of Maharashtra Speaker

The election was expected to take place during the two-day monsoon session which ends on July 6, but neither a meeting of the state cabinet on Sunday nor those held by various leaders of the coalition last week, was able to reach a unanimous decision.

The monsoon session of the state assembly did not witness the much-anticipated election for the post of the Speaker, which would have signalled the strength of the ruling coalition government that has seen a rocky year, including a high-profile resignation of the state home minister – even as 12 BJP legislators, including former ministers Ashish Shelar, Sanjay Kute, Girish Mahajan, and Jaykumar Rawal, were suspended on Monday for alleged misbehaviour.

The post has been lying vacant after Nana Patole resigned to head the state Congress in February. (HT file photo)

The election was expected to take place during the two-day monsoon session which ends on July 6, but neither a meeting of the state cabinet on Sunday nor those held by various leaders of the coalition last week, was able to reach a unanimous decision. While the Congress, a junior partner in the ruling Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) coalition, was keen to hold the election soon, the Shiv Sena and the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) were not.

“Eleven legislators from the treasury benches are absent as they have been affected by Covid-19. In such a situation it was not advisable to hold the poll,” Congress legislator Balasaheb Thorat said.

The post has been lying vacant after Nana Patole resigned to head the state Congress in February. Deputy speaker Narhari Zirwal has been presiding in the absence of the Speaker. As per the power-sharing pact between the three allies, the post would be held by a Congress legislator.

The election is held via a secret vote and is a bellwether of the strength of the government as it indicates how many MLAs are in support of the ruling party – or, in this case, the MVA coalition.

“The election to the post of Speaker is held by secret voting, making it difficult to avert the cross voting. Proving the majority would not be an issue, but keeping the votes we received during the confidence motion in 2019 intact is important,” said a senior Shiv Sena leader on the condition of anonymity.

The MVA government won a floor test in 2019 by polling 169 votes in 288-member House. Besides the strength of 154 MLAs from three parties the ruling alliance, 15 MLAs from smaller parties and independents also supported the government. The BJP, which has 106 seats, claimed to have the support of nine MLAs from smaller allies and independents.

Former CM and BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis’s meetings with BJP’s top leadership, especially with Union home minister Amit Shah in Delhi this week, led a section of BJP leaders to speculate on the longevity of the state government.

In the past few days, the Shiv Sena and the BJP have made overtures towards ending the impasse, prompting political experts to contend that it was likely that the Shiv Sena deferred the Speaker election because of talks between the two parties whose political alliance dates back to 1995 and broke only prior to the formation of the current government.

Shelar met Sanjay Raut of Sena this past Saturday; a day later, Fadnavis also said that Sena and BJP may have differences of opinion but they were not enemies. “We have parted ways due to some differences but we are certainly not enemies. Sena and BJP’s fight is not a long- standing traditional war.”

On Monday, the legislators were suspended during the resolution moved by state government to seek empirical data from the Centre in order to restore reservation granted to members of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) which stands to be abolished following a Supreme Court order. There is 27% reservation in local self-government body elections for this category.

As the discussions became heated, Opposition legislators approached the seat of presiding officer Bhaskar Jadhav and tried to snatch the microphone and remove the mace on the table. Jadhav announced the passing of the resolution. He later told the assembly that the MLAs hurled abuses at him and tried to manhandle him.

The BJP, however, refuted Jadhav’s claims. “Our legislators did not abuse the presiding officer. In fact Jadhav used filthy language which I cannot mention. We apologised to Jadhav, despite which they suspended our MLAs without discussion,” said Fadnavis.