E-Paper
Gyanvapi mosque panel files plea in Allahabad HC seeking stay on ASI survey
In its petition filed on Monday, the committee has said that the order was passed illegally and without jurisdiction. It argued the order came even as the high court had reserved its judgment on the maintainability of the suit pending in the Varanasi court
The management committee of Varanasi’s Gyanvapi Mosque has filed an urgent petition in the Allahabad high court seeking a stay on the April 8 order of a local court allowing a survey to determine whether the Muslim place of worship was built after destroying parts of the Kashi Vishwanath Temple.
In its petition filed on Monday, the committee has said that the order was passed illegally and without jurisdiction. It argued the order came even as the high court had reserved its judgment on the maintainability of the suit pending in the Varanasi court. “The [Varanasi] court should not have passed any order in the suit till the issue of maintainability of the suit was decided,” said SFA Naqvi, the committee’s lawyer.
“Further, the lower court ignored the entire written submissions and the applicability of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 and Order 7 Rule 11D of the Civil Procedure Code while passing the order.”
The 1991 law froze lawsuits to reclaim any place of worship after India was declared independent, except Ayodhya. The Supreme Court last month agreed to review the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act.
On April 8, civil judge (senior division) Ashutosh Tiwari ordered the formation of a five-member committee, comprising two Hindu, two Muslim members, and an archaeological expert, to oversee the “comprehensive physical survey” of the centuries-old Gyanvapi mosque complex. The plea in the case contended the mosque in Varanasi was a part of the temple.
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) will conduct the exercise without any media briefings, Tiwari ordered as he fixed May 31 as the next date of hearing.
“This court finds that survey by ASI alone can bring the truth of the matter before this court. Irrespective of what surfaces, the survey by ASI may go on to help not only to the plaintiffs but also to the defendants, if their version is indeed true,” the lower court order said.
The order was passed in a 1991 suit stayed by the high court in 1998. The trial was re-commenced by the Varanasi court, which held that the stay stood vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s directions in the Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt Ltd case. The apex court had held in this case that a stay granted by a court will end on expiry of six months from the date of such order unless a similar extension is granted.
The suit was filed in 1991 seeking restoration of the ancient temple at the site where the Gyanvapi mosque currently stands. On March 15, the high court reserved its judgment in various pleas challenging the maintainability of the 1991 suit before the Varanasi court.
