E-Paper
Essar case: Top court allows AM/NS, Indian Oil to get arbitrators
The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the decks for the initiation of arbitration proceedings by Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited (AMNSIL) and Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL) to resolve their dispute pertaining to Essar Steel India Limited (ESIL)
NEW DELHI The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the decks for the initiation of arbitration proceedings by Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited (AMNSIL) and Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL) to resolve their dispute pertaining to Essar Steel India Limited (ESIL).
ESIL was acquired by AMNSIL in 2019 through the corporate insolvency resolution process.
A bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, took on record the joint agreement of IOCL and AMNSIL regarding the appointment of an arbitrator each within a week.
“The parties have agreed to nominate two arbitrators within a week. The two arbitrators so appointed will nominate the third arbitrator. In view of the agreement of the parties, the Delhi high court’s judgment dated October 10, 2023, is rendered infructuous,” stated the bench, which also included justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.
The top court held that both sides have the liberty to argue on the aspect of whether the dispute was arbitrable or not, adding that all rights and contentions of the parties are kept open.
While solicitor general Tushar Mehta represented IOCL, senior lawyers Harish Salve and Abhishek Manu Singhvi appeared for AMNSIL in the matter.
On February 5, the Supreme Court reserved its judgment in the appeal filed by IOCL against the October 2023 judgment of the Delhi high court. In its ruling, the high court dismissed IOCL’s plea to appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate a dispute that emanated from a gas supply agreement that it entered with ESIL in 2009.
The contract was terminated by ESIL in 2017, but IOCL objected because it had not broken any of the agreement terms and said that the termination notice must be regarded as ineffectual. After ESIL did not respond to IOCL’s demand notice for termination of the agreement, the latter invoked arbitration but to no avail.
In August 2017, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Ahmedabad admitted ESIL into insolvency proceedings and appointed a Resolution Professional (RP). IOC lodged a claim of over ₹3,500 crore with the RP; who admitted the claim for a notional value of ₹1. This notional value featured in Arcelor Mittal’s resolution plan, which was finally approved by the Supreme Court in November 2019. The resolution plan was implemented and AMNSIL took over the company.
However, IOC approached the Delhi high court in 2022 for the appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate its dispute. The high court turned down IOCL’s plea, noting that the resolution plan was approved by the Supreme Court after hearing the parties. The high court added that once the approval of a resolution plan is accepted by a party, which results in the extinguishment of their claims, it cannot be reopened.
